Strict Scrutiny and Constitutional Review

The video explains the concept of constitutional review, focusing on the highest standard of review applied to laws affecting fundamental rights under the US Constitution. It discusses the application of this standard in due process cases and cases involving suspect classifications. The video outlines the need for a compelling justification for laws, emphasizing that they must be narrowly tailored and the least restrictive means of achieving their objectives. It concludes by highlighting the high burden of proof required under strict scrutiny, often leading to laws being deemed unconstitutional and subject to appellate review.

What is the highest standard of review of a law according to the text?

What must lawmakers provide to justify the constitutionality of a law that affects fundamental rights?

Explain what it means for a law to be narrowly tailored.

What is the significance of a law being the least restrictive means of achieving its objective?

Why are laws subject to strict scrutiny often deemed unconstitutional?