CLEAN : Pro impeachment lawmaker: Annulment of vote illegal and absurd

The transcript discusses the controversial decision made by Vice-President Maranhão, labeling it as absurd, illegal, and unconstitutional. It highlights the decision's impact on the Federal Chamber, which is seen as an attempt to undermine a majority decision. The speaker urges the Senate to ignore Maranhão's decision, emphasizing its irresponsibility.

What is the nature of the decision made by Vice-President Maranhão according to the speaker?

• It is a decision that aligns with the Senate.

• It is a decision supported by the majority.

• It is an absurd and unconstitutional decision.

• It is a well-considered decision.

What does the speaker imply about the legality of Maranhão's decision?

• It is not relevant.

• It is illegal.

• It is partially legal.

• It is fully legal.

How does the speaker describe the attempt to undermine the Federal Chamber's decision?

• As an arbitrary and immoral act.

• As a necessary action.

• As a decision supported by the public.

• As a legal and constitutional move.

What does the speaker suggest about the moral aspect of Maranhão's decision?

• It is morally commendable.

• It is morally questionable.

• It is morally acceptable.

• It is morally irrelevant.

What is the speaker's view on the Senate's responsibility regarding Maranhão's decision?

• To support the decision.

• To implement the decision.

• To ignore the decision.

• To revise the decision.