CLEAN: Norway awaits for the verdict on Breivik

The transcript discusses the concept of insanity in legal cases, questioning the assumption that planning a crime indicates sanity. It argues for a fair trial and justice for all, regardless of the crime committed. The speaker emphasizes that everyone deserves a just trial without torture or extreme punishment, reflecting on personal views about justice and legal processes.

What are the implications of declaring someone insane in a legal context?

What is the speaker's opinion on the argument that planning a crime indicates sanity?

What does the speaker believe about the punishment that should be given?

In what way does the speaker think justice should be applied to the individual?

How does the speaker feel about the fairness of the trial for the individual discussed?