CLEAN: Khmer Rouge victims await prison chief verdict

The speaker reflects on the soundness of the initial verdict and penalty related to Khmer Rouge crimes, acknowledging that while they were appropriate, some Cambodians felt they were insufficient. The speaker emphasizes that public perception should not influence judicial decisions, which should be based on facts and the law.

What is the speaker's opinion on the initial verdict and penalty?

• The speaker disagrees with both.

• The speaker thinks the penalty was too harsh.

• The speaker agrees with the verdict but not the penalty.

• The speaker agrees with both the verdict and the penalty.

Why might Cambodians feel the verdict was insufficient?

• Because the verdict was too lenient.

• Because the crimes of the Khmer Rouge were too severe to be fully addressed.

• Because the penalty was too harsh.

• Because the trial was not publicized enough.

According to the speaker, what should not influence judicial decisions?

• Public perception

• Historical context

• Media coverage

• Legal precedents

What does the speaker believe should guide judicial decisions?

• The facts and the law

• Public opinion

• The severity of the crime

• The emotions of the victims

What is the speaker's stance on the role of public perception in legal decisions?

• It should be the primary factor.

• It should only be considered in high-profile cases.

• It should be considered alongside the law.

• It should not be a factor at all.