VOICED : Panels reject study

The transcript discusses the validity of critiques and statistical tests, highlighting the impact of statistical power on biological studies. It compares the transparency of studies conducted by Monsanto with others and advocates for revising protocols and restricting certain products. The marginalization of studies that show potential risks is also addressed, emphasizing the need for transparency and unbiased evaluation.

What is the main concern about the critiques related to statistical tests?

• They are only relevant to a few studies.

• They are completely unfounded.

• They have been addressed by all companies.

• They could invalidate a large portion of biological studies.

How are the studies conducted by companies like Monsanto treated compared to independent studies?

• They are published openly.

• They are more transparent.

• They are kept secret while independent studies are heavily scrutinized.

• They are less reliable.

What is suggested to ensure fair evaluation of products?

• To keep current evaluators in place.

• To remove biased individuals from committees.

• To stop all product evaluations.

• To rely solely on company studies.

What has been the trend regarding contradictory studies over the past 50 years?

• They have been marginalized and destroyed.

• They have been the basis for new regulations.

• They have been widely accepted.

• They have been ignored completely.

Which researchers are mentioned as having faced challenges due to their studies?

• Charles Darwin and Gregor Mendel

• Albert Einstein and Isaac Newton

• Marie Curie and Louis Pasteur

• Arpad Pouzai, David Quist, and Ignacio Chapella