CLEAN : Toulouse gunmans brother to remain

The judge's decision on the detention of Abdelkader Merah considered all submitted elements. Despite this, his detention was extended due to his failure to identify a third person involved in a scooter theft. However, the judge noted that with upcoming investigations, placing Merah under electronic monitoring could be possible.

What makes the judge's decision particularly interesting?

• It considered all the elements presented.

• It was the first of its kind.

• It was made very quickly.

• It was a unanimous decision.

Why was Mr. Abdelkader Merah's detention extended?

• He was found with illegal items.

• He confessed to another crime.

• He did not reveal the identity of a third person.

• He attempted to escape.

What was the role of the third person in the incident?

• They were the victim.

• They were a witness.

• They were driving the car.

• They were present during the scooter theft.

What future possibility did the judge mention for Mr. Abdelkader Merah?

• Release on bail.

• Transfer to another facility.

• Placement under electronic monitoring.

• Deportation.

What condition could lead to Mr. Abdelkader Merah being placed under electronic monitoring?

• A change in the law.

• A public petition.

• Further investigations.

• Completion of his sentence.