CLEAN : Crimean Tatar leader wins Polands first Solidarity award

The transcript discusses the oppressive attitude of occupying authorities towards the native Crimean population, highlighting the dangers of deciding who should reside in Crimea. It draws parallels to the Soviet system and describes the treatment of Crimean Tatars, emphasizing the lack of recognition and attempts to find collaborators. The text concludes by highlighting recent achievements for Crimean Tatars and their vision for a future within an independent democratic Ukraine.

What is the main concern about the attitude of the occupying authorities towards the indigenous people of Crimea?

• They are promoting tourism excessively.

• They are deciding who should live there.

• They are ignoring the local culture.

• They are providing too much support.

What does the speaker compare the current situation in Crimea to?

• A new democratic system.

• The Soviet system.

• A capitalist society.

• An ancient civilization.

How were the Crimean Tatars treated according to the second section?

• They were given full recognition.

• They were celebrated as heroes.

• They were offered financial incentives.

• They were ignored and attempts were made to find collaborators among them.

What progress has been made for the Crimean Tatars in recent months?

• A new cultural festival was introduced.

• No progress at all.

• A slight improvement in living conditions.

• More progress than in the past 23 years.

What is the future vision for Crimea according to the speaker?

• Remaining part of an independent democratic Ukraine.

• Becoming an independent state.

• Joining the European Union.

• Integration with Russia.