Team Sky '100% clean' amid Wiggins controversy

Team Sky, known for its success in the Tour de France, faces scrutiny over Bradley Wiggins' use of a banned drug under a therapeutic use exemption. The team's principal defends the decision, citing medical necessity and trust in the process. Criticism arises over lack of transparency, prompting policy changes. Ethical questions persist, but Team Sky maintains its commitment to zero tolerance for doping. The situation highlights the balance between transparency and medical confidentiality, ultimately testing public trust.

What substance did Wiggins receive permission to use for treating breathing difficulties?

What concerns were raised regarding the use of therapeutic use exemptions by Team Sky?

How did Brailsford respond to the criticism regarding the team's transparency?

What is the central ethical stance that Brailsford has taken regarding doping?

What does the situation ultimately come down to, according to the text?