Macron Says NATO Needs to Clearly Define Who the Enemy Is

The transcript discusses NATO's burden sharing, emphasizing the importance of both financial and human contributions. It highlights strategic challenges in Europe, particularly after the end of the INF Treaty, and the need for a European component in future negotiations. The speaker questions the current definition of terrorism within alliances, pointing out inconsistencies, especially with Turkey's actions. The transcript concludes with a call for digital education and increased European investment to ensure long-term peace and security.

What are the implications of the US overinvestment in NATO according to the text?

How does the speaker view the role of soldiers in the context of collective security?

What does the speaker suggest is necessary for peace in Europe after the end of the INF Treaty?

What challenges does the speaker identify regarding the definition of terrorism?

In what ways does the speaker believe European investment should change in response to US involvement?