Trump Speech Not Protected From Riot Charges: Harvard’s Tribe

The transcript discusses whether President Trump's speech is protected by the First Amendment, referencing the Brandenburg v. Ohio case. It argues that Trump's actions incited imminent lawless action, which is not protected by the First Amendment, drawing parallels to historical events like the Reichstag fire.

In what way does the speaker describe the events as worse than yelling fire in a crowded theater?

What does the speaker imply about the protection offered by Brandenburg in this context?