Obstruction Now A Major Focus In Trump Documents Probe

The video discusses a legal case involving the Justice Department and former President Trump, focusing on whether a special master should be appointed to review materials seized from Mar-a-lago. Trump's legal team argues for the appointment, citing concerns over attorney-client privilege, while the Justice Department opposes it, emphasizing obstruction and national security risks. Legal experts question the necessity of a special master, and the White House maintains a neutral stance to avoid political interference. Both parties agree on submitting proposals for a special master if appointed, with a hearing scheduled in West Palm Beach.

What concerns were raised about the potential impact of appointing a special master?

What common ground do both Trump's team and the Justice Department share regarding the special master?