Johnson’s Prorogation is Illegal Says Scottish Court - Brexit Explained

The video discusses a Scottish court ruling that declared the prorogation of Parliament by Boris Johnson as unlawful, suggesting it was intended to stymie parliamentary scrutiny. This decision contrasts with earlier rulings by other courts that deemed the prorogation lawful. The video explores the implications of this ruling, the potential for Parliament to reconvene, and the anticipation of a Supreme Court decision that could provide a final verdict. It also highlights differences in Scottish and English constitutional law perspectives.

What was the ruling made by the Inner House of the highest court in Scotland regarding Johnson's prorogation?

Why did the three Scottish judges disagree with the earlier rulings from the outer House and an English court?

What implications does the court's ruling have regarding the Prime Minister's advice to the Queen?

What are the expectations regarding the Supreme Court's ruling on the matter?

How do the understandings of constitutional law differ between Scottish and English courts according to the text?