Statement by Joanna Cherry after Court of Session ruling

The transcript discusses a significant court ruling by Scotland's highest court, declaring the prorogation of Parliament by Boris Johnson as unlawful. Politicians are calling for Parliament to be recalled to scrutinize government actions related to Brexit. The British Government has appealed to the Supreme Court, with hearings scheduled. The legal action was supported by crowdfunding, highlighting public involvement. The ruling is considered a major constitutional decision with wide-reaching implications across the UK.

What was the main reason for the court's decision against Boris Johnson's prorogation of Parliament?

• It was seen as an act of bad faith.

• It was a popular decision among the public.

• It was a routine legal procedure.

• It was supported by the opposition party.

What action did politicians call for following the court's decision?

• To recall Parliament.

• To dissolve the government.

• To initiate new elections.

• To hold a public referendum.

What was the next legal step after the Scottish court's ruling?

• Appeal to the European Court of Justice.

• Appeal to the Supreme Court.

• Appeal to the House of Lords.

• Appeal to the International Court of Justice.

How was the litigation against the prorogation funded?

• Via crowdfunding by the public.

• By private investors.

• Through government grants.

• By international donations.

Why is the court's decision considered significant?

• It was the first of its kind in the UK.

• It had no impact on the legal system.

• It was a minor legal adjustment.

• It was a major constitutional law decision with wide repercussions.