CLEAN : S.Africa court rules Zuma should face almost 800 graft charges

The transcript discusses the decision made on April 1, 2009, by Mr. Machete to discontinue the prosecution of Mr. Zuma, which was deemed irrational and should be reviewed. It highlights the pressure Mr. Himself faced, leading to the decision, and emphasizes the importance of the oath of office to act independently. The transcript supports the continuation of charges against Jacob Zuma, viewing it as a victory for the rule of law, the Constitution, and accountability in South Africa.

What did the speaker believe Mr. Zuma should face?

How does the speaker view the outcome of the decision regarding Mr. Zuma's charges?