Sadiq Khan: Rwanda deportation plan is callous and unlawful

The video discusses the UK's historical role as a refuge for those fleeing persecution and critiques a current government policy deemed callous and unlawful by British and European courts. It highlights the ethical and legal challenges posed by the policy and questions its financial viability, particularly in relation to the costs of deporting individuals to Rwanda. The discussion emphasizes the need for policymakers to consider historical context and ethical implications in their decisions.

What are the implications of the government's refugee policy as discussed in the text?

How does the speaker characterize the government's approach to refugees?

What historical context does the speaker provide regarding the European Court of Human Rights?

In what ways does the speaker question the financial viability of the refugee policy?

What alternative uses of funds does the speaker suggest instead of the current refugee policy?