Why Justice Clarence Thomas Finally Broke His Silence

The transcript discusses Justice Clarence Thomas's silence during Supreme Court oral arguments, which lasted over a decade. It explores the historical context of court arguments, the influence of Justice Scalia, and the changes brought by the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic led to telephonic arguments, prompting Thomas to become more vocal. The transcript also debates the effectiveness of a hot bench versus a cold bench, highlighting Thomas's current role as a leading questioner.

How did Justice Thomas's views on questioning evolve after Justice Scalia's death?

What does the term 'textualist focus' refer to in the context of Justice Thomas and Justice Scalia?

What are some arguments for and against the 'hot bench' approach in Supreme Court oral arguments?