West faces existential threat if global asylum rules not tightened – Braverman

Yuval Lavin from the American Enterprise Institute introduces a talk by Britain's Home Secretary on the critical issue of uncontrolled and illegal migration. He emphasizes the existential threat it poses to Western political and cultural institutions, highlighting historical and political rules about border control. Lavin suggests that nations unable to defend their borders may not survive, and political systems failing to control borders risk losing public consent. He concludes by speculating on potential future developments.

What does the speaker imply about the future of nations that cannot defend their borders?

How does the speaker describe the relationship between border control and the consent of the people?