New law offers ‘safest choice’ to terminally ill who wish to die, says MP

The video discusses a unique bill with three layers of scrutiny involving doctors and a High Court judge. It is designed for terminally ill patients with less than six months to live, ensuring they have capacity and are free from coercion. The bill includes multiple safeguards, making it robust. The debate should focus on the voices of those affected by the current law, highlighting its inadequacies. The speaker urges Parliament to engage with these families to understand the need for change.

What is the significance of having a High Court judge involved in the process?

What are the eligibility criteria for terminally ill people to consider this legislation?

What safeguards are mentioned in the text regarding the decision-making process for terminally ill individuals?

Why is it important for the voices of those who have lost loved ones to be included in the debate?

How does the speaker describe the current law in relation to terminally ill individuals?