CLEAN : Former HSBC employee accused of economic espionage holds presser

The speaker discusses the right to oppose laws one disagrees with and explains their decision not to attend a trial involving a bank that avoided judgment by paying. They emphasize that their stance is not emotional or ideological but a personal contestation of the Swiss position and the trial's attempt to preserve respectability. The speaker feels a duty to challenge these appearances.

Pourquoi l'auteur conteste-t-il les apparences d'achievements financiers?

Quel est le devoir que l'auteur ressent par rapport aux apparences de respectabilité?