Debate viewers in Indiana react while watching on TV as Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton debate for the third and last t

The transcript discusses the sensitive topic of pregnancy decisions, particularly in cases where the mother's health is at risk or late-term pregnancy issues arise. It highlights the speaker's belief that the government should not interfere in these personal decisions. The speaker opposes late-term pregnancy procedures, citing them as unacceptable, and criticizes scare rhetoric. Personal experiences with women facing these challenges are shared to emphasize the complexity and emotional weight of such decisions.

What is the speaker's stance on government involvement in personal pregnancy decisions?

• The government should intervene only in certain cases.

• The government should intervene based on public opinion.

• The government should never intervene.

• The government should always intervene.

What does the speaker believe about the viewpoint attributed to Hillary regarding late-term pregnancy?

• It is acceptable and should be supported.

• It is a common practice and widely accepted.

• It is not acceptable and should be opposed.

• It is a minor issue and not worth discussing.

What is the speaker's opinion on removing a baby from the womb in late-term pregnancy?

• It is a decision that should be left to doctors.

• It is not acceptable and should not happen.

• It is an acceptable choice for the mother.

• It is a necessary medical procedure.

How does the speaker describe the rhetoric used in discussions about late-term pregnancy?

• As informative and necessary.

• As supportive and encouraging.

• As irrelevant and outdated.

• As scare tactics that are unfortunate.

What does the speaker suggest about meeting women who have faced difficult pregnancy decisions?

• It provides valuable insight and understanding.

• It should be avoided to prevent bias.

• It is only useful for medical professionals.

• It is unnecessary and unhelpful.