CLEAN : Russia withdraws signature from ICC founding statute

The video discusses a political demonstration linked to the ICC's decision to recognize Crimea's annexation as part of an international conflict. It highlights Russia's reluctance to participate in ICC processes, citing concerns over sovereignty. The historical context of Russia's criticism of the Hague Tribunal is explored, emphasizing its view of the tribunal as a tool of repression. The video concludes by noting Russia's preference for legal institutions like the Stockholm arbitration and the London High Court, especially in matters involving tangible issues like Yukos shareholder payments.

What is the main reason for Russia's reluctance to participate in the Hague proceedings regarding Crimea?

• Concerns over sovereignty limitations

• Lack of evidence

• Financial constraints

• Support from other countries

How does Russia perceive the Hague Tribunal based on past experiences?

• As a means of repression by the victorious side

• As a tool for international cooperation

• As an effective conflict resolution body

• As a fair and unbiased institution

Which legal institutions does Russia prioritize over the Hague Tribunal?

• International Criminal Court

• Stockholm Arbitration and London High Court

• United Nations International Court of Justice

• European Court of Justice

What type of issues does Russia prefer to address in the Stockholm Arbitration or London High Court?

• Human rights violations

• Environmental disputes

• Financial disputes with Yukos shareholders

• Territorial conflicts

Why does Russia find the outcomes of certain legal battles important?

• They involve tangible matters

• They enhance international relations

• They improve national security

• They promote cultural exchange