Forensic experts say Chile's Neruda did not die of cancer

The transcript discusses the invalidity of the death certificate regarding the cause of death, specifically excluding cachexia. It highlights the need for further results to confirm or exclude third-party involvement in Pablo Neruda's death. The discussion includes the role of cancer and other pathologies, questioning whether they are natural or intentional. The aim is to determine the true cause of death, with a personal belief in third-party intervention.

What was concluded about the death certificate's claim regarding cachexia?

• It was confirmed as the cause of death.

• It was deemed invalid as the cause of death.

• It was partially valid.

• It was not mentioned in the studies.

What is the current status of the investigation into Pablo Neruda's death?

• It is not being investigated further.

• It has been concluded with a natural cause.

• It is pending further results to confirm or exclude third-party involvement.

• It has been confirmed as a violent death.

What type of results are awaited to determine the nature of Neruda's death?

• Results from a historical analysis.

• Results from microbial genomics.

• Results from a public poll.

• Results from a new autopsy.

What is being investigated in addition to the cancerous process in Neruda's death?

• The presence of other pathologies, natural or intentional.

• The involvement of a new disease.

• The role of environmental factors.

• The impact of his lifestyle choices.

What personal belief is mentioned regarding Neruda's death?

• That it was a natural death.

• That it was purely accidental.

• That it was due to negligence.

• That there was third-party intervention.