CLEAN : Woman on trial in France for killing dismembering work rival (2)

The transcript discusses a legal case where the defendant does not plead not guilty but acknowledges the actions without intent to kill. Psychological experts suggest a reactionary attitude due to preexisting aggression, supporting the claim of no intent to kill. The defendant is seen as guilty but shows empathy towards the victim after psychological evaluation.

What does the defendant admit to in the first section?

• Intending to commit homicide

• Causing fatal blows without intent to kill

• Being completely innocent

• Having no involvement in the incident

According to the psychological experts, what might explain the defendant's actions?

• A premeditated plan

• A reactive attitude to pre-existing aggression

• A desire for revenge

• A misunderstanding of the situation

What do the experts find credible about the defendant's case?

• The defendant's alibi

• The lack of intent to kill

• The defendant's complete innocence

• The defendant's remorse

How does the defendant's attitude change according to the final section?

• Shows empathy towards the victim

• Becomes more defensive

• Denies all charges

• Becomes more aggressive

What role do psychological evaluations play in the defendant's case?

• They highlight the defendant's empathy development

• They prove the defendant's innocence

• They confirm the defendant's guilt

• They show the defendant's lack of remorse