CLEAN : Russia to contest doping ban

The transcript discusses the decision-making process regarding a recent WADA ruling on RUSADA's non-compliance. It explains the decision not to agree with WADA's ruling and outlines the steps RUSADA will take, including presenting a recommendation to its members and drafting a letter of disagreement from the general director.

What was the main question regarding the decision-making process?

• Whether the decision was postponed

• Whether the decision was unanimous

• Whether the decision was made by a majority or an absolute majority

• Whether the decision was made by a single person

What was the focus of the discussion on October 9th?

• The future of RUSADA

• WADA's decision on RUSADA's non-compliance

• The election of a new director

• The financial status of RUSADA

What was the decision made in response to WADA's ruling?

• To agree with WADA's decision

• To ignore WADA's decision

• To disagree with WADA's decision

• To seek legal action against WADA

What will be presented to the general assembly of RUSADA?

• A financial report

• A recommendation to disagree with WADA

• A recommendation to agree with WADA

• A new compliance strategy

What is the purpose of the letter mentioned in the final section?

• To express disagreement with WADA's decision

• To request more time for compliance

• To express agreement with WADA

• To announce a new director