Political Endorsements and Reactions

The Washington Week Webcast Extra, hosted by Gwen Ifill, discusses recent political events, including lukewarm endorsements from Jerry Brown and Paul Ryan, the ongoing debates between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, and the latest economic report. The panel also explores the Libertarian ticket's potential impact on the election. The webcast concludes with a call for online engagement.

Who did California Governor Jerry Brown endorse in the 2016 election?

• Paul Ryan

• Bernie Sanders

• Hillary Clinton

• Donald Trump

What was the nature of Paul Ryan's endorsement of Donald Trump?

• Wholehearted support

• Lukewarm acceptance

• Complete rejection

• Enthusiastic endorsement

What was a key reason for Paul Ryan's endorsement of Donald Trump?

• To support Trump's policies

• To advance his own ideas

• To gain popularity

• To oppose Hillary Clinton

What concern did Hillary Clinton express about Donald Trump?

• His economic policies

• His foreign policy experience

• His temperament and decision-making

• His healthcare plan

How did Donald Trump respond to Hillary Clinton's critique?

• By ignoring it

• By agreeing with her

• By changing the subject

• By attacking her over emails

What was a significant issue with the latest jobs report?

• High unemployment rate

• Low job creation numbers

• Increase in inflation

• Decrease in GDP

What was Donald Trump's reaction to the jobs report?

• He ignored it

• He criticized it as a disaster

• He called it evidence of economic success

• He praised the Obama administration

Who is the Libertarian presidential candidate mentioned in the webcast?

• Bill Weld

• Paul Ryan

• Gary Johnson

• Ralph Nader

What is Bill Weld's role in the Libertarian ticket?

• Campaign manager

• Party chairman

• Vice presidential candidate

• Presidential candidate

What is the potential impact of the Libertarian ticket on the Republican Party?

• It could lead to a Democratic victory

• It could appeal to the 'Never Trump' group

• It could unify the party

• It could have no impact