The Missouri Compromise and Its Moral Implications

The Missouri Compromise and Its Moral Implications

Assessment

Interactive Video

History, Social Studies, Moral Science

9th - 10th Grade

Hard

Created by

Patricia Brown

FREE Resource

The video discusses the Missouri Compromise of 1819, highlighting the debate between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions. Representative James Tallmage Jr. argues against slavery, while others defend state rights to choose. Senator Thomas proposes a compromise allowing slavery in Missouri but not in Maine, drawing a line for future territories. The video critiques this compromise as flawed, emphasizing the middle ground fallacy. It concludes with the events leading to the Civil War, noting Lincoln's efforts to limit slavery's expansion.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was Representative James Tallmage Jr.'s stance on slavery in Missouri?

He had no opinion on the matter.

He thought it was a state's right to choose.

He believed slavery was morally wrong and should not be allowed.

He supported slavery in Missouri.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was Representative Tyler's argument regarding slavery?

He supported the abolition of slavery.

He believed the federal government should decide on slavery.

He argued it was a state's right to decide on slavery.

He thought slavery should be banned everywhere.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main feature of Senator Thomas's compromise?

Missouri would be a free state.

Maine would be a slave state.

A line would be drawn to separate slave and free territories.

Slavery would be banned in all new states.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What fallacy does the critique of the Missouri Compromise highlight?

Middle ground fallacy

Red herring fallacy

Slippery slope fallacy

Straw man fallacy

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is a compromise between pro-slavery and anti-slavery views considered flawed?

Because compromise is always wrong.

Because both views are equally valid.

Because one view is morally indefensible.

Because it leads to more debates.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did the founders of the country acknowledge about slavery?

It was a state's right.

It was economically beneficial.

It was morally indefensible.

It was a necessary evil.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the consequence of failing to recognize morally indefensible compromises?

It strengthens political unity.

It resolves conflicts.

It perpetuates injustices.

It leads to economic growth.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?