Miranda Rights and Landmark Cases

Miranda Rights and Landmark Cases

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies, History, Other

9th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Patricia Brown

FREE Resource

The video covers two landmark Supreme Court cases: Regents of the University of California v. Bakke and Miranda v. Arizona. The Bakke case addressed racial quotas in college admissions, ruling that race can be a factor but not the sole criterion. The Miranda case established the requirement for police to inform suspects of their rights, leading to the creation of the Miranda Rights.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What are the two landmark Supreme Court cases discussed in the video?

Plessy v. Ferguson and Marbury v. Madison

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke and Miranda v. Arizona

Dred Scott v. Sandford and Gideon v. Wainwright

Brown v. Board of Education and Roe v. Wade

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main issue in the Regents of the University of California v. Bakke case?

Gender discrimination in college admissions

Racial quotas in college admissions

Religious discrimination in public schools

Age discrimination in employment

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did the California Superior Court decide regarding the special admissions program for minorities?

It violated the U.S. Constitution and the 1964 Civil Rights Act

It was constitutional under the U.S. Constitution

It was a fair practice to promote diversity

It should be expanded to include more minority students

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the final decision of the United States Supreme Court in the Bakke case?

Racial quotas are permissible in college admissions

Race cannot be considered at all in college admissions

Race can be a factor, but not the sole factor, in college admissions

The university must admit all minority applicants

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In what year was Ernesto Miranda arrested?

1973

1993

1963

1983

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What rights was Ernesto Miranda not informed of during his arrest?

His right to a jury of his peers

His right to bail

His right to remain silent and have an attorney

His right to a speedy trial

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the outcome of the Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona?

The case was dismissed due to lack of evidence

The police were required to inform suspects of their rights

Miranda was found guilty without any changes

Miranda was acquitted of all charges

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?