Judiciary and Judicial Review Concepts

Judiciary and Judicial Review Concepts

Assessment

Interactive Video

History, Social Studies, Political Science

9th - 12th Grade

Hard

Created by

Patricia Brown

FREE Resource

The video explores Federalist Paper 78, focusing on the judiciary's role as discussed by Alexander Hamilton and the counterarguments by the Anti-Federalists, particularly Brutus. Hamilton defends the judiciary's independence, emphasizing its lack of power over money and military, while Brutus argues it lacks accountability. The concept of judicial review is highlighted as essential for ensuring laws align with the Constitution, with historical context provided by Marbury v. Madison. The video concludes with reflections on the judiciary as a safeguard against majority tyranny.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main concern of the Anti-Federalists regarding the judiciary as discussed in Federalist Paper No. 78?

Judges would have too much power over financial matters.

The judiciary would have too much control over the military.

Judges would be too accountable to the public.

The judiciary would lack accountability and be too independent.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

According to Hamilton, why should people not worry about the judiciary's power?

The judiciary can create new laws.

Judges can be easily removed from office.

The judiciary has no control over money or the military.

Judges are elected by the people.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does Hamilton suggest is necessary to avoid arbitrary discretion in the courts?

Courts should have financial independence.

Judges should have military experience.

Courts should be bound by strict rules and precedents.

Judges should be elected every four years.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is Brutus's main argument against the judiciary's independence?

Judges are too influenced by public opinion.

The judiciary can create new laws.

There is no authority to control or remove judges.

Judges have too much power over the military.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why does Hamilton argue that judicial review is necessary?

To give judges financial independence.

To check that laws passed by Congress align with the Constitution.

To allow judges to control the military.

To ensure judges can create new laws.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What historical case confirmed the concept of judicial review?

Roe v. Wade

Plessy v. Ferguson

Marbury v. Madison

Brown v. Board of Education

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does Hamilton view the judiciary in relation to the majority?

As a branch that should ignore the majority.

As a safeguard against the tyranny of the majority.

As a branch that should be controlled by the majority.

As a tool to enforce the will of the majority.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?