Eminent Domain and the Kelo Case

Eminent Domain and the Kelo Case

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies

9th - 10th Grade

Hard

Created by

Patricia Brown

FREE Resource

The video covers the story of Susette Kelo, who bought and renovated a house in Fort Trumbull, New London. Despite the city's attempts to use eminent domain to take her property for a development project involving Pfizer, Kelo and other residents fought back. The case went to the Supreme Court, which ruled in favor of New London. This decision sparked a nationwide backlash, leading to changes in eminent domain laws in many states. The video also highlights the broader implications of the case and encourages viewers to reflect on the use of eminent domain.

Read more

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was Susette Kelo's initial reaction to the offers from real estate agents?

She negotiated for a higher price.

She was suspicious and turned them down.

She accepted the offers immediately.

She ignored the agents completely.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the primary purpose of eminent domain?

To protect historical sites.

To allow private companies to expand.

To increase property taxes.

To enable the government to take private property for public use.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why was Pfizer interested in the Fort Trumbull area?

To create a public park.

To open a new pharmaceutical facility.

To build a new shopping mall.

To establish a university campus.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the outcome of the New London Superior Court's decision in March 2002?

Some residents could stay, others had to leave.

All residents had to leave.

All residents could stay.

The case was dismissed.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the final decision of the U.S. Supreme Court regarding the Kelo case?

They refused to hear the case.

They sided with New London.

They ordered a retrial.

They sided with Susette Kelo.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was Justice Sandra Day O’Connor's main argument in her dissent?

Eminent domain should only be used for public parks.

The decision erased the distinction between private and public use.

The decision was beneficial for economic development.

Eminent domain should be abolished.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the public's reaction to the Supreme Court's decision?

Widespread disagreement.

Indifference.

Confusion.

Widespread support.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?