The Violence Against Women Act: US v Morrison (2000)

The video discusses the Supreme Court case US vs. Morrison, focusing on the Interstate Commerce Clause and federalism. It explains how the Commerce Clause has been used historically, such as in the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and its application in the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). The case challenges Congress's ability to regulate interstate commerce, particularly in allowing women to sue attackers in federal court. The Supreme Court ruled that Congress overstepped its bounds, referencing US vs. Lopez, and emphasized states' rights, limiting Congress's power under the Commerce Clause.

What new insight or understanding did you gain from this video?