Memory in the Courtroom, Part II

The video discusses the evolution of legal attitudes towards expert memory testimony, highlighting key cases like State V Chapel that reversed convictions due to the exclusion of expert testimony. It explores the judicial discretion in allowing such testimony and the resistance faced despite growing evidence of wrongful convictions, particularly with the advent of DNA evidence. The video underscores the need for legal reforms to address the issues of faulty eyewitness testimony.

What new insight or understanding did you gain from this video?