Font size
WorksheetsSals of Goods Act 1930
Total questions: 20
Worksheet time: 15mins
Who is buyer?
a person who buys or agrees to buy goods.
a person who is still negotiating
a person who offers to sell goods
a person who is disagree to buy goods
Goods is defined as?
(a)
Goods are of two types. Namely
Existing Good; owned or possessed by seller
private goods
future goods
public goods
What is meant by the term "specific goods"?
Specific goods are goods that are identified and agreed upon at the time a contract of sale is made.
Specific goods are goods that have been specifically made to fulfil the buyer's order
Specific goods are goods that have a specific (rather than a general) use
Specific goods are goods that the seller has had to order specifically for the buyer
What are "existing goods"?
Existing goods are goods that the seller has left over from a previous sale.
Existing goods are goods that are either owned or possessed by the seller.
Existing goods are goods that the seller knows exist but needs to order them specifically for the buyer.
Existing goods are goods that have already been manufactured and therefore exist.
What are "future goods"?
Future goods are goods that the seller needs to order specifically to fulfil the contract of sale.
Future goods are goods that the buyer does not take with him/her at the time of purchase but are to be delivered at a future time
Future goods are goods to be manufactured or acquired by the seller after the making of the contract of sale.
Future goods are goods sold on credit which the buyer can pay for in the future
If the seller breached the contract the buyer has no right to reject the goods and claim damages
True
False
X goes to a Maruti car showroom where 10 Maruti cars have been displayed. Here the 10 cars will be classified as
Unascertained goods
Ascertained goods
Existing goods
X agrees to sell Y all the crops to be grown at his farm in Haryana during the year 2020 season for a sum of Rs 10,00,000. Identify the status
Agreement to sell
Agreement to sell future goods
Agreement to sell contingent goods
Contract for sale
X sold to Y all 700 bags of cement lying in his Delhi's godown. State the legal position if unknown to X all bags had been stolen before the contract was made
The contract is voidable because the goods have perished before making of the contract
The contract is void because the goods perished before making of the contract
The contract is void because the became so damaged as no longer to answer their description.
X purchased a car from Y. After 6 months Z, the true owner of the car, demanded it from X. Should X return it to its true owner
Yes
No
Maybe but can ask for the price
Z should pay the price to X for returning
X purchased from Y tins of condensed milk bearing the label "N brand". It is proved that there was an infringement of trademark. X had to remove the labels and sold the tins at a loss. Is X entitle to sue Y?
X is not entitled to sue Y
X may sue Y
X was entitled to sue Y for the breach of implied condition that Y had the right to sell
X was entitled to sue Y for the breach of implied warranty That Y had the right to sell.
X brought a reaping machine from Y who described it to be one year old and used only to cut 50 to 60 acres but X found that the machine did not correspond to the description by the seller.
X was entitled to reject
X was entitled to reject because it did not correspond to the description given by the seller
X was not entitled to reject
None of the above
X brought from Y certain quantity of worsted coating equal to sample. The coating was equal to sample but due to a latent defect the cloth was found to be unfit for making coats. Can X the buyer reject the goods?
The buyer X was not entitled to reject the goods
The buyer X was entitled to reject the goods
The buyer was entitled to reject the goods because it did not correspond to the sample
The buyer was entitled to reject the goods because the defect contained in the sample was not apparent on reasonable examination of the sample.
X bought from Y foreign refined rapeseed oil which was warranted to be equal to the sample. The oil supplied was equal to the sample. The sample was actually a mixture of rapeseed oil and hemp oil.
X was entitled to reject the goods because it did not correspond to the sample
X was entitled to reject the goods because it did not correspond to the description
X was entitled to reject the goods because it did not correspond to the sample and the description.
None of the above
