1.4 & 1.5

4.6 & 4.7

6.2 & 6.3

7.3 & 7.4

AL 4 :The Vision and Mission of the HEP is disseminated and implemented satisfactorily in the program offering

AL 5 : Improvements to student delivery and assessment methods are implemented innovatively and beyond requirements.

AL 4 : The implementation of monitoring and review of the student assessment process is clear and appropriate

AL 4 : HEPs take appropriate and comprehensive action based on the results of the analysis of student achievement and progress, dropout rates, the number of graduating students and the marketability of graduates.

AL4 : The processes used to ensure the validity, reliability, consistency, timeliness and fairness of the assessment methods are clear, and appropriate. It is reviewed and improved as needed.

AL 4 :The Vision and Mission of the HEP is disseminated and implemented satisfactorily in the program offering

AL 5 : HEPs comply with the entry eligibility requirements set in excess of the minimum stipulations of the MOHE/MQA or other authoritative bodies and/or relevant standards in the student recruitment process. These entry eligibility requirements are constantly reviewed and improved

AL4 : HEPs have clear, appropriate and orderly policies, exemption processes and credit transfers. It is reviewed and improved as needed.

AL4 : HEPs have clear and well -implemented policies related to training (including OBE) and career development of academic staff. It is continuously improved.

AL3 : The program is led by a program leader who is qualified and has appropriate experience in the field.

AL4 : HEPs provide adequate allocation to support teaching and learning activities as well as planning for the progress and sustainability of this program. It is reviewed and improved as needed.

AL5 : HEPs have well -established mechanisms to coordinate the same process and quality of programs across various campuses/premises. It is reviewed and improved as needed.

AL2 : HEPs have plans and strategies in cultivating quality and continuous improvement that are not organized.

5.1 : HEPs provide appropriate physical facilities and educational resources as well as exceeding the requirements in supporting the operation of the program.

2.3 : The implementation of monitoring and review of the student assessment process is clear and appropriate. It is constantly reviewed and improved.

3.6 : The HEP gives an appropriate commitment to the SRC to resolve issues related to student welfare.

4.3 : Active involvement of the entire academic staff of this program in research,* consulting activities,* community service and administrative functions.

AL4 HEPs implement the student admission appeal process in an orderly, appropriate and continuously improved manner.

AL 3 HEPs implement the student admission appeal process in an orderly and appropriate manner.

AL 1 The whole aspect of the capacity of the department is not commensurate with the current number of students.

AL1 HEPs do not have a systematic policy, exemption process and credit transfer.

AL 5 HEPs provide appropriate, adequate student support services in line with the needs of current and future students. It is reviewed and improved as needed.

AL5 The number and qualifications of academic staff meet more than the minimum requirements as well as academic staff are found to teach courses according to areas of expertise.

AL2 HEPs have no policies related to training (including OBE) and career development of academic staff.

AL3 HEPs have training -related policies (including OBEs) and the career development of academic staff is unclear and implementation is limited.

AL4 The active involvement of the majority of the academic staff of this program in research,* consulting activities,* community service and administrative functions.

AL2 HEPs have mechanisms and criteria for evaluating the performance of academic staff but they are unclear and not well implemented.

5.1

5.2

5.3

5.4

5.5

curriculum design

student support

academic staff

CQI

List of quality activities

SOP of quality

Quality council minute of meeting

Management review minute of meeting

College and department quality initiatives