WorksheetsPerp/Angle Bisectors Review
Total questions: 7
Worksheet time: 4mins
Which of the following best describes the relationship between NP and LM?
NP is perpendicular to LM, but not necessarily a bisector.
NP is a bisector of LM, but not necessarily perpendicular.
NP is the perpendicular bisector of LM.
NP is not necessarily perpendicular to or a bisector of LM.
Which of the following best describes the relationship between NP and LM?
NP is perpendicular to LM, but not necessarily a bisector.
NP is a bisector of LM, but not necessarily perpendicular.
NP is the perpendicular bisector of LM.
NP is not necessarily perpendicular to or a bisector of LM.
Which of the following best describes the relationship between NP and LM?
NP is perpendicular to LM, but not necessarily a bisector.
NP is a bisector of LM, but not necessarily perpendicular.
NP is the perpendicular bisector of LM.
NP is not necessarily perpendicular to or a bisector of LM.
Is there enough evidence to prove BD is the angle bisector of ∠ABC ?
Yes, the two half-angles are congruent.
Yes, a point on the line is equidistant to the sides of the angle.
No, the "distances" are not perpendicular.
No, the "distances" are not congruent.
Is there enough evidence to prove BD is the angle bisector of ∠ABC ?
Yes, the two half-angles are congruent.
Yes, a point on the line is equidistant to the sides of the angle.
No, the "distances" are not perpendicular.
No, the "distances" are not congruent.
Is there enough evidence to prove BD is the angle bisector of ∠ABC ?
Yes, the two half-angles are congruent.
Yes, a point on the line is equidistant to the sides of the angle.
No, the "distances" are not perpendicular.
No, the "distances" are not congruent.
Is there enough evidence to prove BD is the angle bisector of ∠ABC?
Yes, the two half-angles are congruent.
Yes, a point on the line is equidistant to the sides of the angle.
No, the "distances" are not perpendicular.
No, the "distances" are not congruent.
