Presuming original arguer had some info as present day.

(a)  

Repeating argument until no one will dispute it

(a)  

Setting up argument so there are only two sides

(a)  

When a "credible" person associates with something that makes it credible

(a)  

Double-meanings or being vague make argument unclear

(a)  

Say/do one thing and then later say/do something else

(a)  

You cannot understand unless you've experienced it

(a)  

Arguing negative chain reaction with little evidence

(a)  

Claiming that the way it's always been done is the way it should always be done

(a)  

Telling a story as evidence

(a)  

Presuming someone's wrong before they even argue

(a)  

Allowing positive or negative outcomes to determine choice

(a)  

Restating without proving anything

(a)  

Creating weak argument designed to be refuted

(a)  

Asking a question that provides answer

(a)  

The effort we put in is all we need to succeed

(a)  

Satire & Parody mistaken for fact

(a)  

Presuming the middle ground is always best

(a)  

Post hoc, ergo propter hoc

(a)  

Claiming first caused last through chain of events

(a)  

Presuming because something happened it was inevitable

(a)  

Criticizing someone based on their appearance or personality

(a)  

Crafting an argument that involves lying by omission

(a)  

Thinking previous random events have effect on future random events

(a)  

Using emotions to cloud judgement

(a)  

Presuming something based on insufficient evidence

(a)  

Dismissing or accepting something because of its origin

(a)  

Distract with tangent to mislead

(a)  

Being a good person with good intentions means you must be right

(a)  

Comparing two dissimilar elements as support for one's argument

(a)  

Presuming guilt because of their connection to a person, organization, or idea

(a)  

Acting against what society expects equates to guilt

(a)  

Dismissing argument as absurd without explanation

(a)  

Audience thinks they understand something they actually don't

(a)  

Believing the manner in which information is presented affects the truth

(a)  

Holding different standards for different people

(a)  

Because we hear/see it in news or social media often means it happens all the time

(a)  

A statement with no room for doubt

(a)  

If society is for it then you're for it

(a)  

Using lack of evidence as evidence

(a)  

Simple solution to a complex problem

(a)  

simplest answer is likely best answer

(a)  

mistake or accident is more likely than malicious intent

(a)