NEW
Font size
WorksheetsLandmark Cases
Total questions: 20
Worksheet time: 10mins
Which Supreme Court ruling applied the principles developed in Weeks v. U.S. to trials in state courts?
Illinois v. Gates.
Horton v. California.
Mapp v. Ohio.
U.S. v. Leon.
Which of the following cases is not concerned or involved issues with the exclusionary rule?
Weeks v. U.S.
Miranda v. Arizona
Mapp v. Ohio.
Terry v. Ohio
Which U.S. Supreme Court case made the exclusionary rule applicable to seizures done by federal officers?
Powell v. Alabama.
Johnson v. Avery.
Chimel v. California.
Weeks v. U.S.
This rule requires that incriminating evidence be seized by police according to the Constitutional specifications of the due process or it will not be allowed as evidence in court.
Procedural rule
Exclusionary rule
Seizure rule
Due process rule
Unreasonable searches & seizures are prohibited by the:
Equality statute
Protection clause
Fifth Amendment
Fourth Amendment
Which U.S. Supreme Court case was responsible for the creation of the exclusionary rule?
Weeks v. U.S.
Chimel v. California
Johnson v. Avery
Powell v. Alabama
The extent of a Terry “pat down” search is limited by what constitutional amendment?
First
Fifth
Fourth
Eighth
Because of Chimel v. California police can search an arrested person without a warrant for the following reason(s):
to protect themselves
to prevent destruction of evidence
to keep a defendant from escaping
all of these are correct
Which court case ruled that a “stop & frisk” search is constitutional?
Terry v. Ohio
Chimel v. California
Tennessee v. Garner
Miranda v. Arizona
The outcome of this case was the creation of a "reasonableness test" when examining an officers actions.
Miranda v. Arizona
Mapp v. Ohio
Tennessee v. Garner
Graham v. Conner
The Court held that police officers arresting a person at home could not search the entire home without a search warrant, but police may search the area within immediate reach of the person in which case?
Weeks v. U.S.
Graham v. Conner
Terry v. Ohio
Chimel v. California
In which decision, did the Court rule that apprehension by the use of deadly force is a seizure subject to the reasonableness requirement of the fourth amendment, and that its use to prevent the escape of all felony suspects was constitutionally impermissible?
Tennessee v. Garner
Terry v. Ohio
Mapp v. Ohio
Graham v. Conner
What famous 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case provided the advisement of rights to criminal suspects prior to police questioning?
Miranda v. Arizona
Chimel v. California
Tennessee v. Garner.
Nix v. Williams
What is a precedent-setting court decision that produces substantial changes in both understanding of the requirements of due process and in the practical day to day operations of the justice system called?
Miranda Warnings
Landmark cases
Exclusionary rule
Stop & Frisk
Which amendment applies to the "interrogation" of a suspect and was a main factor in Miranda v. Arizona?
2nd amendment
4th amendment
8th amendment
5th amendment
The Supreme Court applied the exclusionary rule to the states in 1961 in the case of Mapp v. Ohio.
True
False
A Miranda warning would include “You have a right to bail.”
True
False
A “stop & frisk” search consists of an extensive full body search.
True
False
The case of Tennessee v. Garner involved a fleeing felon and the use of deadly force.
True
False
A “stop & frisk” search is also called a “Terry pat down”.
True
False
