WorksheetsCase Law
Total questions: 26
Worksheet time: 13mins
Allows the officer to pat down a suspect for officer safety
Tennessee v. Garner
Terry v. Ohio
Mapp v. Ohio
Miranda v. Arizona
An arresting officer may search the arrestee's person to discover and remove weapons and to seize evidence to prevent its concealment or destruction, and may search the area "within the immediate control" of the person arrested, meaning the area from which he might gain possession of a weapon or destructible evidence
Chimel v California
Connor v Graham
Mapp v Ohio
Carroll v United States
Under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, a police officer may use deadly force to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect only if the officer has a good-faith belief that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others
Mapp v Ohio
Carroll v US
Terry v Ohio
Tennessee v Garner
Under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, a police officer may stop a suspect on the street and frisk him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous
Abel v. US
Terry v. Ohio
Arizona v. Gant
Miranda v Arizona
Under the Fifth Amendment, any statements that a defendant in custody makes during an interrogation are admissible as evidence at a criminal trial only if law enforcement told the defendant of the right to remain silent and the right to speak with an attorney before the interrogation started, and the rights were either exercised or waived in a knowing, voluntary, and intelligent manner
Miranda V Arizona
Graham v. Connor
Mapp v. Ohio
Brown v. Board of Education
The seizure is legal if the officer, in stopping and searching the vehicle, has reasonable or probable cause for believing that contraband liquor is being illegally transported in it
Abel v. US
Gideon v Wainwright
Carroll v. US
Brown v Board of Education
Segregation of students in public schools violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, because separate facilities are inherently unequal
Garner v Tennessee
Brown v. Board of Education
Mapp v. Ohio
Arizona v. Gant
In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court established that the Fourteenth Amendment creates a right for criminal defendants who cannot pay for their own lawyers to have the state appoint attorneys on their behalf.
Graham v. Connor
Brown v. Board of Education
Miranda v. Arizona
Gideon v Wainwright
The prosecution is not allowed to present evidence that law enforcement secured during a search that was unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment
Mapp v. Ohio
Terry v. Ohio
Abel v. US
Graham v. Connor
A claim of excessive force by law enforcement during an arrest, stop, or other seizure of an individual is subject to the objective reasonableness standard of the Fourth Amendment, rather than a substantive due process standard under the Fourteenth Amendment
Terry v. Ohio
Tennessee v. Garner
Carroll v. US
Graham v. Connor
The warrantless search of a car does not violate the Constitution. The mobility of the automobile makes it impracticable to get a search warrant. An officer may search when there is probable cause that a crime is being committed
Graham v Connor
Arizona V. Gant
Abel v US
Carroll v Us
Police may search the passenger compartment of a vehicle incident to a recent occupant’s arrest only if it is reasonable to believe that the arrestee might access the vehicle at the time of the search or that the vehicle contains evidence of the offense of arrest
Carroll v. US
Arizona v Gant
Brown v. Board of Education
Abel v. US
The temporary detention of a motorist upon probable cause to believe that he has violated the traffic laws does not violate the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable seizures, even if a reasonable officer would not have stopped the motorist absent some additional law enforcement objective
Carroll v. US
Abel v. US
Miranda v Arizona
Whren v. US
The search of the hotel room by an FBI agent without a warrant but with the consent of the hotel management, after petitioner had relinquished the room, and the seizure of articles which petitioner had abandoned there were lawful, and such articles were properly admitted in evidence
Brown v. Board of Education
Abel v. US
Miranda v Arizona
Terry v. Ohio
it is constitutional for American police to "stop and frisk" a person they reasonably suspect to be armed and involved in a crime.
Miranda v Arizona
Arizona v Gant
Terry v Ohio
Gideon v Wainwright
a slave who had resided in a free state and territory (where slavery was prohibited) was not thereby entitled to his freedom; that African Americans were not and could never be citizens of the United States
Dred Scott v Sandford
Brown v Board of Education
Terry v Ohio
Mapp v Ohio
police officers arresting a person at home could not search the entire home without a search warrant, but police may search the area within immediate reach of the person without a warrant.
Dred Scott v Sanford
Mapp v. Ohio
Brown v Board of Education
Chimel v. California
a police officer may not use deadly force against a fleeing, unarmed suspect. The fact that a suspect does not respond to commands to halt does not authorize an officer to shoot the suspect, if the officer reasonably believes that the suspect is unarmed
Tennessee v Garner
Graham v Connor
Chimel V California
Abel v US
applies to the rights of suspect to remain silent or have an attorney present during custodial interviews/interrogations
Brown v Board of Education
Mapp v Ohio
Graham v Connor
Miranda v Arizona
Struck down "separate but equal"
Brown v Board of Education
Chimel v US
Carroll v. US
Miranda v Arizona
the Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial guaranteed all defendants facing imprisonment a right to an attorney, not just those in death penalty cases.
Graham v Connor
Mapp v Ohio
Arizona v Gant
Gideon v Wainwright
evidence obtained from an unreasonable search and seizure could not be used against the accused in criminal state court
Chimel v California
Mapp v Ohio
Dred Scott v Sanford
Gideon v Wainwright
USE OF FORCE
constitutionally appropriate levels of force, based on the unique circumstances of each case: severity of crime, threat, resisting arrest, evading arrest by flight
Terry v Ohio
Mapp v Ohio
Garner v Tennessee
Graham v Connor
police using traffic infractions as a reason to stop vehicles in order to discover more serious crimes
Wren v Us
Mapp v Ohio
Miranda v Arizona
Arizona v. Gant
There is nothing unlawful about seizing abandoned property in a hotel room and admitting it into evidence at trial
Abel v. US
Chimel v California
Gideon v Wainwright
Carroll v US
Chief Justice Taney wrote that enslaved people “are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word 'citizens' in the Constitution, and can, therefore, claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States.”
(this decision was overturned by the 14th Amendment)
Brown v Board of Education
Dred Scott v Sandford
Mapp v Ohio
Chimel v California
