This type of reasoning makes the mistake of falsely presenting the audience with only two choices/sides (one choice is obviously worse than the other).

This type of fallacy oversimplifies an issue. It does not consider the valid points of the opposing side. It builds up the other side as weak and attacks this weak argument because it is easier to do.

This is a conclusion based on insufficient or biased evidence. In other words, you are rushing to a conclusion before you have all the relevant facts.

The Bee Movie is the best movie because it is awesome!

The kid down the street lied to me. All kids in my neighborhood are liars.

My grandmother ate burgers and French fries every day, and she lived to be 98 years old. Burgers and fries are healthy food for everyone.

You are a good person or a bad person; there is no in between.

My Uber driver in Cincinatti, Ohio was loud and obnoxious. Everyone from that city is annoying.

You like dogs, or you like cats. No body likes both.

The other candidate in this election does not value the special bond between man and animal since they are against allowing pets in school.

If you say I can't have ice cream for breakfast, you must never want children to enjoy life.

You should vote for Kate! She is a great communicator because she knows how to talk to others well.

You are either a book worm, or you love to make TikTok videos.