WorksheetsAP Gov Required Court Case Practice
Total questions: 76
Worksheet time: 1hrs 12mins
School sponsorship of religious activities (teacher led / directed prayer) violates the establishment clause
Tinker v. Des Moines
Engel v. Vitale
Wisconsin v. Yoder
Schenck v. United States
Bolstered freedom of the press, establishing a "heavy presumption against prior restraint" even in cases involving national security
Schenck v. United States
New York Times Co. v. United States
Mc Donald v. Chicago
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Extended the right to privacy to a woman's decision to have an abortion
Roe v. Wade
Griswold v. Connecticut
Wisconsin v. Yoder
McDonald v. Chicago
Political spending by corporations, associations, and labor unions is a form of protected speech under the 1st Amendment.
United States v. Lopez
Marbury v. Madison
Buckley v. Valeo
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Choose all that apply: These cases deal with the 1st Amendment's speech clause
Tinker v. Des Moines
Schenck v. United States
Citizens United v. FEC
New York Times v. United States
Engel v. Vitale
Legislative redistricting must be conscious of race and ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act of 1965, but race may not be the sole rationale behind redistricting decisions
Baker v. Carr
Shaw v. Reno
Mc Donald v. Chicago
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
This case deals with the Free Exercise Clause of the 1st Amendment
Wisconsin v. Yoder
Roe v. Wade
Engel v. Vitale
McDonald v. Chicago
Check all that apply: These are incorporation cases that apply a right found in the Bill of Rights to the states through the 14th Amendment
Gideon v. Wainwright
McDonald v. Chicago
Marbury v. Madison
Tinker v. Des Moines
This case reverses a trend of expanding federal power and limits the government's ability to act pursuant to the Commerce Clause
Marbury v. Madison
New York Times v. United States
McCullouch v. Maryland
United States v. Lopez
If one is arrested for a misdemeanor and cannot afford an attorney the suspect is entitled to a lawyer free of charge courtesy of what case?
Gideon v. Wainwright
Engel v. Vitale
Tinker v. Des Moines
Wisconsin v. Yoder
Which of the following cases are related to the First Amendment?
McDonald v. Chicago
Engel v. Vitale
Tinker v. Des Moines
Wisconsin v. Yoder
This case was based on the Establishment Clause
McDonald v. Chicago
Engel v. Vitale
Tinker v. Des Moines
Wisconsin v. Yoder
This case was based on the Free Exercise Clause
McDonald v. Chicago
Engel v. Vitale
Tinker v. Des Moines
Wisconsin v. Yoder
Which of the following cases are free speech cases?
New York Times v. United States
Schenck v. United States
Tinker v. Des Moines
Roe v. Wade
Which of these cases incorporated the 2nd Amendment?
Engel v. Vitale
Schenck v. United States
McDonald v. Chicago
Roe v. Wade
Which of these cases limited citizens' free speech rights?
Schenck v. the United States
New York Times v. United States
Tinker v. Des Moines
Wisconsin v. Yoder
After a national census has been taken, changes in population distribution cause the changing of congressional seats among the states. This effect is commonly called
Congressional districting
Apportionment
Gerrymandering
Reapportionment
Under the guidelines of the Constitution, which of the following is NOT within the jurisdiction of the federal courts?
cases involving federal law
cases involving interpretation of state constitutions
cases involving interpretation of the federal Constitution
treaties
When making an appointment to the Supreme Court, presidents
remain impartial by refusing candidate endorsements from the Supreme Court
often select a candidate who is neither decidedly liberal or conservative
tend to ignore race as a consideration for selecting a judge
tend to choose judges from their own political party
The majority opinion, issued by the Supreme Court as the final decision of a case, becomes the standard or guide that will be followed in deciding similar cases in the future. This standard or guide is known as a
precedent
brief
argument
decision
The judicial philosophy that advocates the courts' active role in policymaking is called
strict constructionist
judicial activism
loose constructionist
judicial restraint
Miranda V. Arizona set what precedent?
Peaceably protesting in schools
a non segregated education (overturned Plessy)
You must have your rights read to you upon arrest
Separate but equal
In the United States, an accused person is presumed innocent until
He/she is proven guilty in a court of law
Evidence against him/her has been discovered
Police obtain an arrest warrant from a court
Eyewitnesses testify against him/ her in a court of law
To convict a suspect in a criminal case,
the jury must reach a verdict within 24 hours.
the jury must acquit the defendant.
the jury must reach a unanimous verdict.
a two-thirds majority of the jury must vote against the suspect.
The Constitutional Convention sought to replace the Articles of Confederation because they
created a large central government
guaranteed a separation of powers
failed to provide for states' rights
did not have the ability to tax and provide for the common defense
A pivotal event that symbolized the problems with the Articles of Confederation and demostrated the need to reform the Articles was
Shays's Rebellion
Nat Turner's Rebellion
the faliure of all states to send troops for defense against a new British attack
a national tax to help pay the debt incurred by the Revolutionary War
The Constitution creates a system that prevents excessive power being accumulated by the national government through
judidical review
federalism
checks and balances
representative government
Feds ask for PRIOR RESTRAINT (ability to censor something before it is published) to stop publishing the Pentagon Papers. This freedom of the press case led to a ruling that the government may not censor information unless it revels secrets involving national security.
NY Times v. U.S. (1971)
Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
Baker v. Carr (1961)
Engel v. Vitale (1962)
The Gun Free School Zones Act was found unconstitutional, its reliance on the power to regulate interstate trade to criminalize carrying a firearm near a school was too broad of a use of the necessary and proper clause to expand the reach of the commerce clause.
U.S. v. LOPEZ (1995) FEDS LOSE!
CITIZENS UNITED v. FEC (2010)
GIDEON v. WAINWRIGHT (1963)
McDONALD v. CHICAGO (2010)
Members of the Amish faith challenged a state law requiring all children be educated until the age of 16. Their use of the Free Exercise clause of the 1st amendment succeeded, allowing them to choose to leave school after the 8th grade.
NY Times v. U.S. (1971)
Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)
Baker v. Carr (1961)
Engel v. Vitale (1962)
A dispute flowing from Tennessee's lack of redrawing district lines to keep up with population changes in that state, this case involves the Equal Protection clause of the 14th amendment. The SCOTUS ruled that redistricting cases were within jurisdiction, making them "justiciable". This case leads to later rulings requiring a "one man equals one vote" expectation in the country
Baker v. Carr (1961)
Shaw v. Reno (1993)
McDonald v. Chicago (2010)
Roe v. Wade (1973)
A security guard is banned by law from bringing his handgun home with him. SCOTUS rules a ban on handgun ownership violates the 2nd amendment. This case is an INCORPORATION case, meaning it extended the 2nd amendment onto states and cities with its decision.
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
Engle v. Vitale (1962)
Baker v. Carr (1961)
McDonald v. Chicago (2010)
A Freedom of Speech case, with a new SCOTUS standard/precedent claiming that words present a "clear and present danger" of criminal action can be punished by law. A man claiming "free speech" protection for telling others to avoid the draft loses and his conviction stands.
Citizens United v. FEC (2010)
Schenck v. US. (1919)
Engel v. Vitale (1963)
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
A question of whether the U.S. Government has the power to create a national Bank, due to its power to print money plus the Necessary and Proper clause. Also a question of whether a state can tax said bank without violating the Supremacy Clause from the Constitution. The court rules in favor of the federal government, strengthening the federal government overall.
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Schenck v. US. (1919)
Engel v. Vitale (1963)
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
A freedom of speech case, answering the question of whether students can be punished for symbolic speech that could be controversial, and therefore disruptive to the education process. Students do not give up their rights when they come to school, the court ruled.
Shaw v. Reno (1993)
Schenck v. US. (1919)
Engel v. Vitale (1963)
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
An incorporation case...A man charged with breaking and entering/burglary cannot afford a lawyer at his trial. After being sentenced to prison, he appeals to the SCOTUS, claiming that Florida tried him without following the 6th amendment requirement that he be represented by "counsel". The SCOTUS agrees with his argument that the 14th amendments DUE PROCESS clause incorporates the 6th amendment onto the states.
Shaw v. Reno (1993)
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
Engel v. Vitale (1963)
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
Teachers begin each day by leading students in prayer, and parents object. They claim the school is violating the establishment clause of the first amendment. The SCOTUS agrees, ruling that since attendance in school is compulsory, kids are being subjected to undue influence to promote religion.
Shaw v. Reno (1993)
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
Engel v. Vitale (1963)
McDonald v. Chicago (2010)
A case about Congressional redistricting, the SCOTUS ruled that a North Carolina district relied heavily on racial demographics. The precedent relied on the 14th amendments EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE, saying that districts drawn where race is one of the biggest factors are unconstitutional. Race can be a factor, but must not bet the main factor.
Tiner v. Des Moines (1969)
Shaw v. Reno (1993)
Engel v. Vitale (1963)
U.S. v. Lopez (1995)
A freedom of speech case, involving the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) of 2002. An interest group was prevented from releasing a movie about Hillary Clinton paid for by donations of corporations and unions from spending money to influence elections, violated the Free speech clause of the First amendment.
Citizen United v. FEC (2010
Shaw v. Reno (1993)
McDonald v. Chicago (2010)
U.S. v. Lopez (1995)
A 14th amendment EQUAL PROTECTION clause case, this case ignored the principle of "stare decisis", overturning an exiting precedent that said segregation with equal treatment is not unconstitutional. Segregating schools based on race violates the Constitution.
Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
Baker v. Carr (1961)
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)
The clear-and-present danger test devised by the Supreme Court in the case of Schenck v United States was designed to define the conditions under which public authorities could
ban obscene materials
suspend habeas corpus protections
limit free speech
commit troops to situations of potential foreign combat
In Gideon v. Wainwright, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the
Bible could be distributed at public schools under the free exercise clause of the First Amendment
exclusionary rule prevented the introduction of evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment from being introduced in court
Sixth Amendment right-to-counsel provision applies to those accused of major crimes under state laws
Eighth Amendment cruel-and-unusual-punishment provision cannot be applied in a discriminatory manner
Which of the following best describes the holding in Baker v. Carr (1961) ?
Unequal representation of citizens in legislative districts is unconstitutional and may be reviewed by the courts.
Political issues such as reapportionment, redistricting, and gerrymandering are to be resolved by the legislative branch.
Racial gerrymandering is a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause.
Gerrymandering that favors a single party is not subject to legal action because there is no standard to determine how a state legislative district map should be drawn.
Supreme Court nominees are confirmed by...
House of Representatives
President
Senate
Chief Justice
If a Supreme Court justice agrees with the decision of the court, but did not agree with the reasoning of how they came to that conclusion, the justice may write a ____.
Plurality Opinion
Majority Opinion
Dissenting Opinion
Concurring opinion
What is the opinion of the Supreme Court justices who make up the minority?
Dissenting Opinion
Majority Opinion
Concurring Opinion
Plurality Opinion
A ruling in an earlier case that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent cases is a ______.
Writ of Certiorari
Majority Opinion
Precedent
Original jurisdiction
Justices who believe that the court should act as an instrument of public policy are said to have which judicial philosophy?
Judicial Activism
Judicial Restraint
Conservative
Liberal
This orders a lower court to deliver its records in a case so that a higher court may review it
Amicus Curiae Brief
Writ of Certiorari
Precedent
Rule of Four
This principle means "let the decision stand"
Writ of Certiorari
Precedent
Amicus curiae
Stare decisis
Kennedy has spilled some gasoline on Nathan’s lawn. Nathan asks Kennedy to pay for the removal of the gasoline and to repair the damage it has caused. Kennedy refuses and so Nathan sues him in court. In this case, Nathan is the ______ in a _____ case.
defendant; civil
plaintiff; civil
defendant; criminal
plaintiff; criminal
Kevin is arrested for burglary of a habitation in Oklahoma. He is found guilty in the lower state court but feels a constitutional error has been made and appeals first to _____, and if unsuccessfully there, he can appeal to ______.
the federal court of appeals; the U.S. Supreme Court
the Oklahoma Supreme Court; the U.S. Supreme Court
the Oklahoma Supreme Court; the federal court of appeals
the federal district court; the U.S. Supreme Court
In most federal cases, district courts act as the trial courts and thus possess _____.
criminal law
appellate jurisdiction
civil law.
original jurisdiction
The middle level of the federal constitutional courts is/are the _____.
courts of appeal
district courts
U.S. Supreme Court
state supreme courts
