NEW
Font size
WorksheetsPhilosophy Truth and Fallacy Theories
Total questions: 15
Worksheet time: 8mins
Imagine you have a treasure map, and you follow the map to a spot. If the spot matches what the map shows, then the map is true. In the same way, if what someone says matches what's really happening, we can say it's true
Deflationary Theory of Truth
Coherence Theory of Truth
Correspondence Theory of Truth
Pragmatic Theory of Truth
Think of building with colorful building blocks. If all the blocks fit together nicely without any gaps or wobbling, your tower is coherent and stands tall. Similarly, if all the things someone says fit together nicely without any conflicts, we can say their ideas are true.
Deflationary Theory of Truth
Coherence Theory of Truth
Pragmatic Theory of Truth
Correspondence Theory of Truth
Picture a superhero who always knows the best way to solve problems. If what this superhero says helps make things better and solves issues, then we can think of their advice as true. So, truth is like having a superpower that helps us in real life.
Correspondence Theory of Truth
Pragmatic Theory of Truth
Deflationary Theory of Truth
Coherence Theory of Truth
Imagine you have a balloon, and when you say something is true, it's like letting a little air out of the balloon. Saying "The sky is blue" is like saying "The sky is blue" without making a big deal out of it. So, truth is simple and doesn't need a lot of extra fuss.
Coherence Theory of Truth
Deflationary Theory of Truth
Constructivist Theory of Truth
Pragmatic Theory of Truth
Think of a big jigsaw puzzle with lots of pieces. Different people might put the puzzle together in slightly different ways. Truth is like the picture on the puzzle, and each person's perspective helps create the truth, like putting the pieces together.
Coherence Theory of Truth
Constructivist Theory of Truth
Deflationary Theory of Truth
Pragmatic Theory of Truth
Imagine you're playing a game, and someone says, "Your idea is bad because you wear glasses." That's like saying the idea is wrong just because of something about you, not because of the idea itself. We should focus on the ideas, not on the person saying them.
Circular Reasoning
Ad Hominem Fallacy
Strawman Fallacy
False Dichotomy (Either/Or Fallacy)
Picture building a sandcastle, and someone comes along and says, "Your sandcastle is supposed to be a dragon!" But you never said that. That's like changing what someone said to make it easier to argue against. We should talk about what people really think, not what we make up about them.
Circular Reasoning
False Dichotomy (Either/Or Fallacy)
Strawman Fallacy
Ad Hominem Fallacy
Think about choosing ice cream flavors. If someone says, "You can only like chocolate or vanilla, not both," that's like saying there are only two choices when there might be many more. We should remember there are often more options than just two.
Circular Reasoning
Circular Reasoning
False Dichotomy (Either/Or Fallacy)
Hasty Generalization
Imagine trying to explain why you like pizza, and you say, "Pizza is great because it's my favorite food." That's like going in a circle and not really explaining why pizza is your favorite. We need reasons that make sense.
Begging the Question
Post Hoc Fallacy (Correlation vs. Causation)
Circular Reasoning
False Dichotomy (Either/Or Fallacy)
Picture your favorite teacher saying, "You should eat ten candies a day because I said so." But your teacher might not know much about candies. It's like saying something is true just because an important person said it. We should still think about if it makes sense.
Post Hoc Fallacy (Correlation vs. Causation)
Appeal to Authority
Circular Reasoning
Hasty Generalization
If you try a new vegetable and say, "I don't like any vegetables," that's like deciding about all vegetables based on just one. We should try more examples before deciding what's true for everything.
Appeal to Ignorance
Begging the Question
Hasty Generalization
Post Hoc Fallacy (Correlation vs. Causation)
Imagine you wear your lucky socks and then win a game. Saying, "My socks made me win" is like thinking just because two things happen one after the other, one caused the other. We need more proof to be sure.
Red Herring Fallacy
Post Hoc Fallacy (Correlation vs. Causation)
Begging the Question
Appeal to Ignorance
Think about asking, "Why is the sky blue?" and someone says, "Because it's the color of the sky." That's like not really answering the question and going in a circle. We need a better explanation.
Post Hoc Fallacy (Correlation vs. Causation)
Begging the Question
Appeal to Ignorance
Red Herring Fallacy
If someone says, "There are aliens because we haven't proved there aren't," that's like assuming something is true just because we don't know it's false. We need evidence to say something is true.
Hasty Generalization
Appeal to Ignorance
Red Herring Fallacy
Begging the Question
Imagine asking about homework, and someone starts talking about their pet dog. That's like changing the subject to something unrelated. We should stick to what we were talking about and not get distracted.
Post Hoc Fallacy (Correlation vs. Causation)
Red Herring Fallacy
Appeal to Ignorance
Begging the Question
