WorksheetsTorts (Fill in Blank/Definition)
Total questions: 26
Worksheet time: 1hrs 18mins
A statement that harms a Plaintiff's reputation.
2 types: Slander or libel.
Plaintiff must be alive to allege this claim.
(a)
Strict products liability 4 defenses
1) Comparative negligence
2) Assumption of risk
3) (a)
4) Reseller exemptions/limitations
Legal obligation requiring actor to conform to certain standard of conduct
(a)
6 Affirmative Duties:
1) Status Relationship
2) (a) relationship
3) Voluntary undertaking
4) Co-adventure
5) Defendant-created danger
6) Statute created
A defendant has no general duty to take affirmative action to aid a plaintiff in many jurisdictions. However, once a defendant actually takes such action, they have a duty to exercise due care as to their subsequent conduct; should not leave in worse position.
(a)
People who enter land b/c open to public or 2) People who enter land to provide a “material benefit” to the landowner, such as business visitors/customers
(a)
(a) have a basic duty to warn about dangers but not "open and obvious"
Evidence of this is relevant but not dispositive to show breach
(a)
Most social visitors, or a person who enters the land with the landowner’s permission but not an invitee
(a)
Child trespassers are typically treated like adult trespassers however landowner is potentially liable for harm suffered by child trespasser if 5 elements are satisfied.
(a)
If an invitee voluntarily goes beyond the reasonable scope (typically venturing to an area not reasonably part of the purpose for the license) then become a (a)
The general rule of the RPP is objective meaning the Ds individual characteristics do not matter however: 1) People with (a) physical impairments are judged by a standard that recognizes their physical limitations
The plaintiff identifies some precaution the defendant should have taken and argues that if that precaution had been taken, the injury would likely not have occurred.
(a)
The general rule is that a plaintiff (a) recover in negligence if the plaintiff’s only injury was emotional or economic harm.
Extended liability for emotional harm to P who was not physically injured but who could have and nearly was if : 1) P was in the (a) and 2) The P suffered physical symptoms of the distress. This test requires physical proximity and physical symptom
Liability for emotional harm may arise if the plaintiff observes a (a) relative (parent, sibling, child or spouse) suffering physical harm as it is being negligently caused by another. Requires physical injury to relative and proximity to the accident, merely learning about it is insufficient
“Pure”______ loss, (i.e., ______ loss without physical injury or property damage) is not generally recoverable in a negligence claim.
(a)
An activity or thing that interferes with the use and enjoyment of land owned by an individual or a small number of individuals.
(a)
Elements for private nuisance :
1) The Defendant (a) Interfered with the Plaintiff’s Use or Enjoyment of Land
2) The D Acted either : 1) intentionally (or knowingly) and unreasonably -or- 2) negligently, recklessly, or abnormally dangerous
Defamation (a) : generally defined as a false statement that is not defamatory on its face, so the plaintiff must introduce extrinsic evidence to prove it is defamatory. In such cases, the plaintiff must prove actual damages.
To establish a defendant’s liability for defamation, a plaintiff must prove
1) False Statement, 2) Of and Concerning the P, 3) (a) , 4) Fault, and 5) Either : actual damages (defamation per quad) or presumed damages (defamation per se)
Which is not a situation giving rise to an affirmative duty to act
Property owners
Those who create a danger, even non-negligently
People who witness a situation that requires medical assistance
Custodial relationship ie. doctors, jailers and similar professionals who “take charge” of dangerous people
Complete the definition (Mulitiple Answers)
A landowner owes a duty:
warn natural conditions
warn a known or anticipated trespasser of human-made conditions on the land that pose a risk of death or seriously bodily harm
of reasonable care in undertaking activities of the land
warn human-made conditions that does not pose a risk
warn dangers that are open and obvious
True or False :
Duty to licensees are to: 1) warn about already known or 2) make safe already known dangers or 3) duty of reasonable care with regard to activities undertaken on the land
True
False
Which is not an exception to the general objective RPP rule where the Ds individual characteristics do not matter
Children
Professionals & People with Special Knowledge or Skills
Bailees
Landowners and Trespassers
Guest Statutes
Which is not a legitimate excuse for the Defendant's Noncompliance with the Law (Negligence Per Se)
Compliance with the safety law was impossible due to circumstances beyond the defendant’s control
The defendant acted reasonably but nevertheless was unable to comply with the safety law
The defendant did not know and reasonably should not have known that compliance with a statute was necessary
Compliance with the safety law would have imposed a greater risk of harm than noncompliance
The defendant's conduct place in an inherently dangerous activity
