WorksheetsRC Design Quiz
Total questions: 50
Worksheet time: 36mins
In EC2, when is it necessary to provide additional shear reinforcement beyond the minimum requirements?
When design shear exceeds the shear capacity
When design shear is less than the shear capacity
Only in seismic zones
Only for large structures
True or False: In accordance with EC2, flat slabs are designed without beams.
True
False
In comparing a one-way and a two-way slab under the same UDL and support conditions, the two-way slab typically experiences:
Higher midspan moment per meter width
More deflection along short span
Lower required slab thickness
Equal reinforcement in both directions
While reviewing a cantilever beam design, you find that tension bars are curtailed too early near the fixed end. What failure is most likely to occur first?
Bond failure
Flexural failure
Shear failure
Anchorage pullout
An RC slab shows service cracks wider than the EC2 allowable limit. Which adjustment provides the best long-term solution?
Decrease bar spacing and use smaller bars
Increase bar diameter and spacing
Increase slab thickness
Use higher strength concrete
During beam detailing, a student uses a 200 mm effective depth and provides tension steel resulting in a low lever arm z. What is the most significant implication on beam behaviour?
Reduced shear strength
Increased crack width
Inefficient moment resistance
Excessive anchorage length
What is a key characteristic of a two-way slab?
Supports loads in one direction
Requires a high aspect ratio
Distributes loads in two directions
Is only used for cantilever designs
An existing slab fails the deflection check under service load. Based on EC2, which modification is most effective to bring it within limits without altering thickness?
Add more top steel
Reduce load factor
Decrease spacing of tension reinforcement
Provide compression reinforcement
What is the primary purpose of using shear reinforcement in beams?
To reduce deflection
To enhance ductility
To prevent shear failure
To resist bending moments
What is the typical design approach for controlling deflection in reinforced concrete beams?
Reduce the span of the beam
Increase the depth of the beam
Use higher strength concrete
Add more tension reinforcement
A two-way slab with aspect ratio 1.0 shows early corner cracking during service. Which of the following design flaws is most likely responsible?
Lack of torsional reinforcement at corners
Underestimated punching shear
Improper boundary conditions
Excessive cover to reinforcement
Given two beams of the same span and loading — one with high-strength concrete (C50/60) and one with normal-strength concrete (C30/37) — what is the expected design trade-off?
High-strength beam requires more reinforcement
High-strength beam is more ductile
High-strength beam has lower strain capacity
High-strength beam allows shallower section
You are evaluating an RC beam where the calculated moment capacity MRdM_{Rd}MRd is marginally lower than the design moment MEdM_{Ed}MEd. Which is the most rational solution under EC2 without increasing beam size?
Increase concrete cover
Add compression reinforcement
Reduce partial safety factor
Remove stirrups near midspan
