WorksheetsLAW 2019
Total questions: 74
Worksheet time: 37mins
Any Filipino citizen can acquire A&D lands of the public domain through lease, provided it is not more than ______ hectares.
1000
500
12
24
For purpose of qualifying a public land applicant of a free patent under RA 10023, the average annual income of a 2nd class municipality where he is applying is equal to or more than 45 million but not exceeding.
65M
55M
45M
75M
Any person found extracting and disposing minerals without a mining agreement lease, permit or license, shall upon conviction be fined or imprisoned from six months to ___ years.
10
12
3
6
A thing which is physically impossible to be divided among co-owners, must be
Given to the poorest co-owner.
Sold and he proceeds will be divided among the co-owners.
Divided even if the thing property gets destroyed
Obtained by the majority of the co-owners.
Are Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries (ARBs) required to pay for the registration of land titles under CARP?
No, but they are required to pay after the harvest season.
No, they are not required under existing laws.
Yes, for a minimal amount.
Yes, but the amount is less what is required by DENR.
The posting of notice in a land registration case is placed in the bulletin board or in a conspicuous place of the ______.
Bulletin board of the Provincial Hall
Bulletin board of the Municipal Hall
Bulletin board of the city hall
Each portion of the land
A parcel of land owned in common by five sisters who are all OFWs and their only brother, Juan. Juan remained as a farmer and is the only co-heir tilling the land for more than 30 years. The five other co-heirs requested Juan to subdivide the land being cultivated by him. Juan refused violently. Can the co-heirs demand the subdivision of their property?
Yes, because of the existence of co-ownership.
No, because Juan is the actual tiller of the land.
No, Juan is in actual possession of the land.
Yes, Juan has been enjoying all the benefits for the past 30 years.
Can the government have disposed of any property of public dominion?
Yes, because the government is the owner.
No, because it is outside the commerce of man.
No, but the government can always exercise its police power.
Yes, but it should pass through DENR.
Can DAR/PARC take immediate cognizance of any agrarian dispute or contrives under CARP?
No, it should first pass through PARC.
Yes, DAR can immediately take action in order to facilitate section thereof.
No, it should first through the BARC who shall endorse the same to the PARC.
Yes, DARAB can take immediate action.
The allowable area for mining exploration by an individual in any one province is twenty (20) meridional blocks or equal equivalent to ____ hectares.
1,500
1,620
2,620
500
Is a beneficiary whose land was foreclosed still qualified under CARP?
Yes, but he has to wait for 5 years.
No, he is already disqualified.
No, he should transfer to another municipality.
Yes, but he has to wait for three years.
The government and its desire to vigorously pursue forest protection programs of chainsaws are regulated to prevent further distraction of our forest.
Ownership
II. Importation
III. Transfer
Mrs. Reyes is the registered owner of a vacant lot. Without her consent, Mitoy erected his small house. If there was bad faith on the part of the builder, can the land owner demand the demolition of the house?
No, Mitoy is protected by the Urban Poor Law.
Mitoy has the right to retain the structures until paid.
Yes, she can under the law.
Mitoy can demand reimbursement of his expenses.
In case the land owner rejects the offer of the amount of compensation of his land covered by CARP. Who will determine the just compensation of his property?
PENRO
COURT
CENRO
PARC
Is tax declaration and payment of taxes thereon a proof of ownership?
Yes, because there are no other applicants.
No, you are not paying taxes religiously.
Yes, because you believe you are the owner of the land.
No, it is not a conclusive proof of ownership.
RA 9175 is also known as Chainsaw Act of 2002 is being implemented by the province of Palawan by the ______ in accordance with the strategic environmental plan for Palawan.
Provincial development and coordinating council.
Provincial environment and natural resources office
Palawan council for sustainable development.
Office of the provincial governor.
A titled property left by their parents was sold by four of the five forced heirs without the knowledge of one of the heirs who is living in an adjacent town. Is the sale valid?
Yes, because one of the heirs was able to buy a house & lot.
No, because of estoppel against the other heir.
No, because of the exclusion of one of the heirs.
Yes, because the deed of sale is already notarized.
Who is considered the father of Torrens System?
Sir Richard Ray Torrens
Sir Robert Richard Torrens
Sir Richard Raymond Torrens
Sir Ray Robert Torrens
The decision of the reconstituting officer or the Register of Deed under RA 6732 is subject to the final review and or decision of the LRA Administrator, he may _____ the said decision.
Affirm
II & III
I & II
Reverse
Modify
Bruno contracted the services of Geodetic Engr. Juan to conduct a relocation survey of his twenty-four hectares property for a professional fee of P180,000. Who is the passive subject?
Bruno
Creditor Bruno
Survey man of Engr. Juan
Engr. Juan Geodetic
Before the delineation of the boundaries of the ancestral domain of a particular indigenous community, the NCP shall require the following:
Written accounts of the concerned indigenous cultural communities of their political structures and institutions.
Documents directly or indirectly attesting to the occupation of the area since time immemorial by the applicants
I&II
d. I, II,&III
Testimonies of elders or community leaders under oath.
Under the UNCLOS agreement, damage of foreign ship shall be considered prejudicial to the persons coastal sea if in the territorial sea.
If the ship is in danger
Any fishing activity
Any artificial distress
A travel without authority.
Which agency of the government can bring action in court in order to revert a private land back to the government?
Land Management Bureau
Land Registration Authority
Provincial Agrarian Reform Office
Office of the Solicitor General
The cancellation of a free patent is between the grantor and the
DARAB
Applicant/ grantee
DENR
LRA/ Registration of deeds
Can family members of the transferor repurchase the land under RA 6657?
No, because it is prohibited to transfer lands required under RA 6657.
No, it is against the law and therefore there is nothing to repurchase.
Yes, within two years
Yes, within three years.
The minimum period given to a license under the timber license agreement, renewable for the same period is ____ years.
50
25
30
10
What are the distinctions between usufruct and a lease?
In a usufruct, it is always a real right, while in a lease, it may be a real or a personal right.
In a usufruct, it is created by contract, while in a lease, it is created by the government.
In a lease contract, the leasee has duty to make ordinary repairs, while in usufructuary, he has no duty to make repairs.
None of the above.
Prior to the expiration of his lease contract, can an individual in alienable public agricultural land allowed by law to purchase the lease area.
Yes, to ensure that every square inch of the land become productive.
No, the leased area cannot be purchased. It can only be leased.
No, the leased area cannot be the subject of sales patent application.
Yes, subject to restrictions of existing laws, rules and regulations.
How many hectares can a private corporation or association lease alienable and disposable (A&D) lands of the public domain?
24
1000
1500
12
Can an owner of a piece of land claims that he is also the owner of the aerial space exactly corresponding to the size of his property on the surface of the earth?
No, it is against aerial navigation
Yes, but is limited to the size of a 150 story building
No, he is not the owner.
Yes, subject to restrictions.
Other than the applicant, who else is being notified in an ordinary land registration proceeding?
Director, NHA
DAR Regional Director
Director, LMB of DENR
Director General of NEDA
The mining area as surveyed and monumented by a deputized geodetic engineer or Bureau geodetic engineer is a requirement in the approval of the mining feasibility. Who approves the aforementioned survey?
MGB Regional Director where the mining claim is located
Regional Director of the DENR
RTD for lands
MGB Bureau Director
The CENRO concerned, shall process the public land application under RA 10023 for a non-extendible period of days, from the date of filing of the ____ application.
160
130
90
120
If you are a victim of forcible entry, what will you do to protect your interests?
Use force and intimidation to recover your property
Call the attention of the concerned PARO.
File a complaint for ejectment immediately.
Refer the matter to the LRA administrator.
Some of the co-owners of an old house would like to convert it into a hotel for productive purposes. Others would like to preserve as an ancestral home. What is the best solution?
Seek relief from the court.
They should seek assistance from the office of the city engineer.
Proceed with the conversion anyways, it is beneficial to everybody.
Consult other relatives
Mang Juan promised to pay Engr. Maria 150,000 pesos if he can undertake a subdivision survey of his property, which is located in an MNLF infested area. This is an example of
pure obligation and contract
casual obligation
mixed obligation and contract
conditional obligation
Can we acquire public dominion through prescription?
Yes, if we are in actual occupation and cultivation
No, because there is no public land application filed
Yes, if we are in open and continuous, possession
No, it cannot be acquired through prescription
Is it always unethical to review the work of another geodetic engineer?
Yes, but with certain limitations.
No, if you are permitted by him to do so.
Yes
Is it always unethical to review the work of another geodetic engineer?
Yes, but with certain limitations.
No, if you are permitted by him to do so.
Yes, because it is violation of the PRC Law.
No, the work was only done by a survey man.
When do we consider that possession of a piece of land becomes unlawful?
When the lease contract expires
When the possessor abandoned the property
When there is a demand to vacate the said parcel of land.
When the lessee is a builder in bad faith.
An agreement where another company in organized by the government and the contractor with both parties having equal shares. Aside from earnings in equity, the government shall be entitled to a share to the gross output.
Joint Venture Agreement
Mineral Production Sharing Agreement
Co-Production Agreement
Labor Production Agreement.
Maximum area, Exploration permit, onshore, in any one (1) province, corporation.
100 blocks
500 blocks
1000 blocks
200 blocks
Maximum area, Mineral agreement, offshore, entire Philippines, individuals.
20 blocks
100 blocks
50 blocks
40 blocks
In an open market housing with road width of 10 meters, the planting strip should be ___ meters.
1.3
0.4
0.8
0.6
What is the minimum floor area for a duplex in medium cost housing?
42 sq.m
54 sq.m
30 sq.m
48 sq m
The DAR is hereby vested with the primary jurisdiction to determine and adjudicate agrarian reform matters and shall have exclusive original jurisdiction over all matters involving the implementation of agrarian reform except those falling under the exclusive jurisdiction of __ and __.
DOJ and RTC
NHA and HLURB
DA and DENR
RD and LRA
Maria failed to pay the realty taxes on her unregistered agricultural land located in Magdugo, Toledo City. To satisfy the taxes due, the City cold it at public auction to Juan whose bid at P10.000.00 was the highest. Maria refused to turn-over the possession of the property to Juan alleging that she had been granted a free patent. Did Maria divest of her ownership through the tax sale?
Yes, because she is delinquent in paying her taxes.
No, she has one year to redeem.
Yes, because the land is unregistered.
No, she was able to obtain free patent.
A owned a parcel of unregistered land located on the Tarlac side of the boundary between Tarlac and Pangasinan. His brother B owned the adjoining parcel of unregistered land on the Pangasinan side. A sold the Tarlac parcel to X in a deed of sale executed as a public instrument. After X paid in full the price of the sale, X took possession of the Pangasinan parcel in the belief that it was the Tarlac parcel. After twelve (12) years, a controversy arose between B and X on the issue of the ownership of the Pangasinan parcel. Who is the rightful owner of the Pangasinan parcel?
B has vested right of ownership over the Pangasinan parcel because B never sold that parcel to X or to anyone else.
X has vested right of ownership over the Pangasinan parcel by acquisitive prescription, because X possessed this parcel for over ten years under claim of ownership.
It is co-owned by B and X subject to reimbursement by A.
The state because the land is still unregistered.
Marciano is the owner of a registered parcel of land through which a river runs out into the sea. The land is cultivated by Ulpiano and his family as farmworkers therein. Over the years, the river brought sediment from its source up in the mountains and forests so that gradually the land owned by Marciano increased in area by three hectares. Ulpiano built three huts on this additional area, where he and his two married children live. On this same area, Ulpiano and his family planted peanuts, mongo, beans and vegetables. Ulpiano also regularly paid taxes on the land, as shown by tax declaration, for over thirty years. When Marciano learned of the increase in the size of the land he ordered Ulpiano to demolish the huts, and demanded that he be paid his share in the proceeds of the harvest. Who is the owner of the 3-hectare accretion?
Marciano, under the civil code, the alluvium belongs to him as a registered riparian owner to whose land the accretion attaches.
Ulpiano because the accretion is still unregistered and can be subject of acquisitive prescription by third persons.
Ulpiano because he has been paying for real estate taxes for more than 30 years.
State owns the additional land because it was not brought to Torrens System.
In 1965, Renren bought from Robyn a parcel of registered land evidenced by a duly executed deed of sale. The owner presented the deed of sale and the owner's certificate of title to the Register of Deeds. However, no transfer of certificate of title was issued to Renren because the original certificate of title in Robyn's name was temporarily misplaced after fire partly gutted the Office of the Register of Deeds. Meanwhile, the land had been possessed by Robyn's distant cousin. Mikaelo, openly, adversely and continuously in the concept of owner since 1960. It was only in April 1998 that Renren sued Mikaelo to recover possession. Who shall prevail in the case?
Renren because the sale was registered in RD.
Mikaelo by acquisitive prescription.
Renren because it is not his fault that the title was lost.
Mikaelo by laches.
JV, owner of a parcel of land, sold it to PP But the deed of sale was not registered. One year later, JV sold the parcel again to RR, who succeeded to register the deed and to obtain a transfer certificate of title over the property in his own name. Who has a better right over the parcel of land?
RR
PP
JV
It depends
Regina has been leasing foreshore land from the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources for the past 15 years. Recently, she learned that Jorge was able to obtain a free patent from the Bureau of Agriculture, covering the same land. Regina filed an action for annulment of Jorge's title on the ground that it was obtained fraudulently: Will the action proper?
Yes, under Chapter IX of C.A. No. 141, otherwise known as the Public Land Act, foreshore lands are disposable for residential, commercial, Industrial, or similar productive purposes, and only by lease when not needed by the government for public service.
Yes, if the land is suited or actually used for fishpond or aquaculture purposes, it comes under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) and can only be acquired by lease under P.D. 705.
Yes, free patent is a mode of concession under Section 41, Chapter VII of the Public Land Act, which is applicable only for agricultural lands.
All are acceptable answers.
Manuel was born on 12 March 1940 in a 1000-square meter property where he grew up helping his father, Michael, cultivate the land. Michael has lived on the property since the land was opened for settlement at about the time of the Commonwealth government in 1935, but for some reason never secured any title to the property other than a tax declaration in his name. He has held the property through the years in the concept of an owner and his stay was uncontested by others. He has also conscientiously and continuously paid the realty taxes on the land. Michael died in 2000 and Manuel - as Michael's only son and heir - now wants to secure and register title to the land in his own name. What must he prove and document/s is/are necessary for the registration?
He must show that the land is already classified as A & D 'at the time the application for registration is filed' and that he has been in 'possession and occupation thereof' in the manner required by law since June 12, 1945, or earlier.
To show the classification of the land as A&D, the application must be accompanied by a CENRO or PENRO certification; and a certified true copy of the original classification approved by the DENR Secretary.
To identify the land, he must submit the tracing cloth plan or a duly-certified blueprint or whiteprint copy thereof.
Manuel may tack his possession to that of his predecessor-in-interest (Michael) by the testimony of disinterested and knowledgeable eyewitnesses. Overt acts of possession may consist in introducing valuable improvements like fencing the land, constructing a residential house thereon, cultivating the land and planting fruit bearing trees, declaring the land for taxation purposes and paying realty taxes, all of which are corroborative proof of possession.
On March 27, 1980, Cornelio filed an application for land registration involving a parcel of agricultural land that he had bought from Isaac identified as Lot No.2716 with an area of one (1) hectare. During the trial, Cornelio claimed that he and his predecessors-in-interest had been in open, continuous, uninterrupted, public and adverse possession and occupation of the land for more than thirty (30) years. Can Cornelio acquire the parcel of agricultural land by prescription?
Yes, by extraordinary prescription.
No, because he has no just title.
Yes, only after it was declared part of alienable land by the state.
No, there is no showing of good faith on the part of Cornelio.
The property of Jessica lies along the banks of the Marikina River. At certain times of the year, the river would swell and as the water recedes, soil, rocks and other materials are deposited on Jessica's. Jessica constructed a concrete barrier about 2 meters from her property line and extending towards the river, so that when the water recedes, soil and other material are trapped within this barrier. After several years, the area between Jessica's property line to the concrete barrier was completely filled with soil, effectively increasing Jessica's property by 2 meters. Can Jessica validly claim to the patch of land?
Yes, by the process of alluvium.
No, by the process of avulsion.
Yes, to offset the possible loss due to erosion.
No, because it is reclamation without authority.
In 1935, Janice possessed alone a parcel of land which she co-owned with Lenny. In 1970, with the knowledge of Lenny, Janice obtained a Torrens title over the land in her own name alone. On August 1, 1988, Lenny brought an action against Janice for reconveyance of her share. Will this prosper?
Yes, because co-ownership is imprescriptible.
No, because the Janice wag able to obtain a title for herself.
Yes, because Lenny has her share over the land.
No, Lenny is barred by laches.
In 1950, the Bureau of Lands issued a Homestead patent to A. Three years later, A sold the homestead to B: A died in 1990, and his heirs filed an action to recover the homestead from B on the ground that its sale by their father to the latter is void under Section 118 of the Public Land Law. Can the heirs still recover?
No, the action has already prescribed.
Yes, the sale of the land by A to B 3 years after issuance of the homestead patent is void from its inception.
No, both of the parties are at fault.
Yes, the sale was done beyond the prohibition period.
Which of the following statements is wrong?
Patrimonial property of the state, when no longer intended for public use or for public service, shall become property of public dominion.
All property of the State, which is not of public dominion, is patrimonial property.
The property of provinces, cities and municipalities is divided into property for public use and patrimonial property.
Property is either of public dominion or of private ownership.
Raul, Ester, and Rufus inherited a 10-hectare land from their father. Before the land could be partitioned, however, Raul sold his hereditary right to Raffy, a stranger to the family, for P5 million. Do Ester and Rufus have a remedy for keeping the land within their family?
Yes, they may be subrogated to Raffy's right by reimbursing to him within the required time what he paid Raul.
Yes, they may be subrogated to Raffy's right provided they buy him out before he registers the sale.
No, they can be subrogated to Raffy's right only with his conformity.
No, since there was no impediment to Raul selling his inheritance to a stranger.
X, Y, Z are siblings who inherited a 10-storey building from their parents. They agreed in writing to maintain it as a co-owned property for leasing out and to divide the net profits among themselves equally for a period of 20 years. On the 8th year, X wanted to get out of the co-ownership so he could get his 1/3 share in the property. Y and Z refused, saying X is bound by their agreement to keep the co-ownership for 20 years. Who is correct?
X
No one
Y and Z
All of them
Lauro owns an agricultural land planted mostly with fruit trees. Hernando owns an adjacent land devoted to his piggery business, which is two (2) meters higher in elevation. Although Hernando has constructed a waste disposal lagoon for his piggery, it is inadequate to contain the waste water containing pig manure, and it often overflows and inundates Lauro's plantation. This has increased the acidity of the soil in the plantation, causing the trees to wither and die. Lauro sues for damages caused to his plantation. Is Hernando liable?
No, the benefit of a natural easement in favor of his higher estate, which imposes upon the lower estate the obligation to receive the waters descending from the higher estate.
Yes, the owner of the higher estate can make works which will increase the burden on the servient estate.
Lauro's land is burdened with the natural easement to accept or receive the water which naturally and without interruption of man descends from a higher estate to a lower estate.
Yes, Hernando has constructed a waste disposal lagoon for his piggery and it is this waste water that flows downward to Lauro's land.
The residents of a subdivision have been using an open strip of land as passage to the highway for over 30 years. The owner of that land decided, however, to close it in preparation for building his house on it. The residents protested, claiming that they became owners of the land through acquisitive prescription, having been in possession of the same in the concept of owners, publicly, peacefully, and continuously for more than 30 years. Is this claim correct?
No, the residents have not been in continuous possession of the land since they merely passed through it in going to the highway.
No, the owner did not abandon his right to the property; he merely tolerated his neighbors' use of it for passage.
Yes, residents of the subdivision have become owners by acquisitive prescription.
Yes, community ownership by prescription prevails over private claims.
Rex, a philanthropist, donated a valuable lot to the municipality on the condition that it will build a public school on such lot within 2 years from its acceptance of the donation. The municipality properly accepted the donation but did not yet build the public school after 2 years. Can Rex revoke the donation?
Yes, since the donation is subject to a resolutory condition which was not fulfilled.
No, but Rex is entitled to recover the value of the land from the municipality.
No, the transfer of ownership has been completed.
Yes, the donation is not deemed made until the suspensive condition has been fulfilled.
Are agricultural lands with free-patent titles covered by CARP?
No, because they are privately owned.
Yes, it is private agricultural land.
No, it is not covered by CARP.
Yes, if the farmer voluntarily submits it for coverage.
Which of the following is exempted from CARP coverage?
Homestead land
Free Patent Land
Upland which are above 18% slope
Private Agricultural Land
Can an Agrarian Reform Beneficiary (ARB) acquire title to his/her land awarded through PD 27 or RA 6657?
No need because rights has already vested upon awarding.
Yes, through CLOA and EP
No, it is prerogative of DAR.
Yes, if the farmer wants to apply for title.
What acts may be considered sufficient to show the prior classification of the land as A and D?
Cadastral survey of a municipality preparatory to the filing of the petition for cadastral proceedings.
Titling of properties around the land subject of registration.
Report and recommendation of the District Forester for the release of the property from the unclassified region.
Executive proclamation withdrawing from a reservation a specific area and declaring the same open for entry, sale or other mode of disposition.
The primary purpose of cadastral proceedings is
to determine conflicting claims of ownership in the area subject of cadastral survey.
to provide a remedy, without any expense, for the correction of errors in the technical description of lands already titled so as to conform to the cadastral survey.
to settle and adjudicate title to lands.
to determine the priority or relative weight of two or more certificates of title for the same land.
What is the concept of ownership of ancestral domains?
They are part of the lands of the public domain under the concept of jura regalia.
They are the private but community property of indigenous peoples.
They are all natural resources therein, belong in private ownership to indigenous cultural communities based on native title.
They are owned by the State pursuant to Section 2, Article XII which states that all lands and all other natural resources are 'owned by the State.'
Minerals are discovered underneath Pedro's titled property. Who has the right to exploit the minerals?
The government has the absolute right to exploit the minerals.
Pedro has the right to exploit the minerals because he is the absolute owner of the land.
Pedro does not have the right to exploit the minerals because he owns the surface area only.
The government has the right to exploit the minerals upon prior expropriation of the property.
Reconstitution denotes reconstruction of a lost or destroyed original certificate of title. The term 'any other document' as a source of reconstitution may include
an order of the court for the issuance of the decree.
An approved survey plan and technical description of the land.
A certification by the LRA that a decree of registration was in fact issued.
none of the above.
Under the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act (RA No. 8371), registration under the Torrens system of individually-owned ancestral land requires
possession for not less than 30 years immediately prior to the approval of the law on October 29, 1997.
possession since June 12, 1945 or earlier.
possession for not less than ten (10) years in good faith
possession for not less than 30 years.
If only a portion of the land covered by a certificate of title is sold by the owner and the deed is presented for inscription, the Register of Deeds
shall annotate the deed by way of memorandum on the grantor's certificate of title, original and duplicate.
shall not enter any transfer certificate to the grantee until a plan of the land showing all the portions or lots into which it has been subdivided shall have been verified and approved.
shall issue a new certificate of title to the grantee for the portion conveyed and at the same cancel the grantor's certificate partially with respect only to the portion conveyed.
Both a & b.
Pedro decides to sell his property to Jose only to discover the loss of his owner's duplicate certificate of title covering it. What initial recourse should Pedro take?
Report the fact of loss to the police and then file a petition for replacement of the lost title before the court.
Send a notice under oath to the Register of Deeds of the province or city where the land lies as soon as the loss is discovered.
Promptly file with the proper court a verified petition for replacement of the lost title.
Proceed with the documentation of the sale and then file a petition for replacement of the lost title.
