Worksheetsstrab final
Total questions: 18
Worksheet time: 11mins
Patient 1: 5 year old male here for strabismus evaluation. Parent says that the teacher says their eye turns in only when they are reading, and not when they are looking at the board. The child reports no double vision. No history of surgery. Which of the following is at the top of your differential list?
Accommodative Esotropia
VI nerve palsy
Consecutive ET
Basic Eso
Patient 1: The patient initially has poor responses and is moving all around. You decide to do a Hirschberg/Kappa. The results are below, through your cyclo trial frame (the patient is best corrected):
Hirschberg: OD: -1.0 mm OS: -0.5 mm
Kappa: OD: +0.5 mm OS: -0.5 mm
Choose the correct interpretation
33 PD RXT
33 PD LXT
33 PD RET
33 PD LET
Patient 1: The child calms down. You do a full cover test:
Cyclo ret:
OD: +2.50 DS (20/40 PHNI)
OS: +1.75 DS (20/20)
PD: 55 mm
Cover test sc distance:
UCT: cover right eye, left eye doesn't move. cover left eye, right eye doesn't move
ACT: Movement out by 15 PD
Cover test sc near:
UCT: cover right eye, left eye moves out. cover left eye, right eye moves out.
ACT: Movement out by 35 PD
Cover test with cyclo ret distance:
UCT: cover right eye, left eye doesn't move. cover left eye, right eye doesn't move
ACT: Movement out by 8 PD
Cover test with cyclo ret near:
UCT: cover right eye, left eye moves out. cover left eye, right eye moves out.
ACT: Movement out by 20 PD
Based off this data alone, what is the likely diagnosis?
Non refractive accommodative ET
Refractive accommodative ET
Combination accommodative ET
Partially accommodative ET
Patient 1: Assuming this patient has a partially accommodative ET with a comitant deviation, what would be the most likely findings on Hess Lancaster?
Patient 1: You perform Bagolini on your patient. Here are the findings, assuming glasses are put on as described in lecture:
Two lines, two lights. Lights are located above the cross.
Fusion response with 20 BO
UCT: Movement in ~ 10 PD
What is their correspondence status?
PAC 1
HAC
PAC 2
UAC
NC
Patient 1: You use the Major amblyoscope. When measuring angle S, the patient reports that the fish is never in the tank. Without any other information, what could be happening?
Poor motor fusion
A vertical component not seen in previous tests
Suppression
Anomalous Correspondence
Horror fusionis
Patient 1: You do a worth 4 dot on the patient. Red lens over right. These are the findings:
6 m: Light: 2 red dots. 4 dots with 12 BO. Movement out on UCT.
6 m: Dark: 5 dots, 2 red to the right. 4 dots with 12 BO. Movement out on UCT.
40 cm: 5 dots, 2 red to the right of the green dots. stable 4 dots with 15 BO. Movement out on UCT
Which of the following best describes the patient's profile?
Shallow central suppression OS. Adequate sensory fusion, poor motor fusion
Deep central suppression OS. Anomalous sensory fusion, poor motor fusion.
Shallow central suppression OS. Anomalous sensory fusion, adequate motor fusion
Shallow central suppression OS. Anomalous sensory fusion, poor motor fusion
Patient 1: You do a 4 BO test on this patient, but you forget to complete the entire procedure because you only practiced this once in lab years ago.
Prism over the right eye - right eye moves in, left eye doesn't move
Interpret the findings:
OD central suppression
OS central suppression
Presence of microtropia OS
Presence of microtropia OD
As Dr. Lee says - "don't forget anything you learned"
Unable to interpret due to incomplete findings
Patient 2: Your 15 year old patient comes in for their first eye exam. Their mother tells you they noticed their child may have an recent eye turn, but she seems to be a poor historian and the child says this is something that they've had all their life.
Your entrance testing shows restriction of the left eye in patient's left lateral gaze. Full and unrestricted in all other gazes.
Select all the differentials that could be possible for this patient.
Duane Retraction syndrome Type II
Duane Retraction syndrome Type 1
CN VI Palsy
Comitant Basic Eso with NO crossed fixation
CN IV Palsy
Patient 2: How would you differentiate between Duane Type 1 OS and CN VI palsy OS? (Select all that apply)
MRD 1 and 2 will decrease on adduction in Duane Type 1
MRD 1 and 2 will decrease on abduction in Duane Type 1
Only in Duane type 1 will the patient appear to have an Eso deviation in primary gaze
Only in a CN VI palsy will the patient appear to have an Eso deviation in primary gaze
Patient 3: Your 6 year old patient comes in for an eye exam because they failed a school screening.
VA: OD 20/80 distance and near
OS: 20/20 distance and near
Cyclo refraction:
OD: +0.50 DS
OS: -1.00 -0.50 x 175
Ocular health: No abnormal findings OD/OS
Cover test Dist: Ortho
Cover test Near: Ortho
With only this information, what are the most likely differential diagnoses? Select all that apply.
Anisometropic Amblyopia OD
Malingering
Streff Syndrome
Microtropia with identity
Patient 3:
BCVA OD: 20/80
OS: 20/20
CT: Ortho distance and near
What other data would confirm that your patient has microtropia with identity?
Visuoscopy: 1 NEF
Cupper's bifoveal: AC
Positive 4 BO test
Sees 3 green lights on worth 4 dot at 40 cm
Patient 4: Your 6 year old patient is brought in because his mom says that his right eye turns out occasionally. Your patient has no complaints.
Cyclo ret: OD: +5.00 DS (20/100 D/N, PHNI)
OS: +3.25 DS (20/20)
Distance UCT cc: Cover left eye, right eye moves in 100% of time. Cover right eye, left eye doesn't move
Distance ACT cc: Right eye fixating 18 BI, Left eye fixating, 16 BI
Near UCT: cc Cover left eye, right eye moves in 25% of the time. Cover right eye, left eye doesn't move.
Near ACT cc: Right eye fixating: 10 BI, left eye fixating, 8 BI
Is there amblyogenic factor here? And if there is, what is the cause? (select all that apply)
No amblyogenic factor
Amblyogenic factor - Isoametropic
Amblyogenic factor - anisometropic
Amblyogenic factor - strabismic
Patient 4: Your 6 year old patient is brought in because his mom says that his right eye turns out occasionally. Your patient has no complaints.
Cyclo ret: OD: +5.00 DS (20/100 D/N, PHNI)
OS: +3.25 DS (20/20)
See PACT in DAF findings in photo
What kind of deviation does this patient have?
A pattern Exo
V pattern Eso
A pattern Eso
V Pattern Exo
Comitant Deviation
Patient 4: You perform Hering Bielchowsky on your patient. Initially you do it incorrectly - uncorrected. Then you do it corrected. Choose ALL the correct statements.
The patient cavaries - correcting the patient pushes the patient into diplopia, causing the afterimages to separate.
The patient has NC - they see single uncorrected and double when the plus decreases their accommodative convergence and the patient becomes tropic.
The patient is experiencing HAC when they are fully corrected. They are most likely diplopic when the afterimages are separated.
Based off the patient's response, it is impossible to tell if the patient sees single or double, but they most likely usually do not experience diplopia.
Patient 4: You do visuoscopy on this patient and find the following findings:
OD: See picture
OS: Steady, central fixation
Major Amblyoscope findings:
Objective angle: 25 BI
Subjective angle: 18 BI
Douse: Movement in
What type of AC does this patient have?
UAC
PAC I
HAC
PAC II
Patient 4: You perform Haidinger's Brush and After Image transfer on this patient. These are your results. Interpret your findings.
At = 8 PD
EF = 4 TEF
At = 4 PD
EF = 8 TEF
At = 10 PD
EF = 5 TEF
At = 5 PD
EF = 10 TEF
Patient 4: You explain to your patient that they have an intermittent exotropia. Which of the following are true that you could inform your patient/their mother. (Select all)
The parent will notice that the eye will swing out more often in the evening
The ability to control their eye turn does not depend on how large the magnitude is.
If you pay close attention, you may notice your patient squinting their good eye in bright light
IXT is commonly seen at birth and then goes away, but pathologic onset usually occurs around the age of 4-5
