WorksheetsPage 1
Total questions: 100
Worksheet time: 50mins
A startup team is struggling with coordination because members act independently without relying on each other’s outputs. Which key characteristic of a group should the team strengthen first to improve effectiveness?
Interaction among members through routine updates
Shared goals written in a mission statement
Interdependence among members on complementary tasks
Sense of belonging through social activities
A faculty committee is created by the university to redesign the curriculum with a six-month deadline. Which type of group best fits this scenario, and why?
Primary group because ties are long-term emotional
Secondary group because objectives are family-like
Informal group because colleagues meet by preference
Formal group because it is created by an organization
Two coworkers begin a lunchtime running club that later influences office wellness policies. What explains how this small social cluster gained organizational influence?
Security needs convert to formal authority automatically
Informal groups can shape norms and decisions indirectly
Primary groups dissolve when goals become organizational
Secondary groups provide no influence beyond projects
A project manager must form a team for a complex analytics project that cannot be accomplished by a single analyst. Which recruitment pitch best aligns with a core reason people join groups?
Join to achieve goals requiring combined expertise
Join to gain recognition from external media
Join to learn company procedures for orientation
Join to avoid isolation during long sprints
A family-owned business relies on trust built over decades. Which classification best captures this unit and what implication follows for conflict management?
Secondary group; conflicts remain impersonal and brief
Informal group; conflicts lack any emotional history
Formal group; conflicts resolved only by policy
Primary group; conflicts intertwine with enduring ties
An organization wants members to internalize expected behaviors without constant supervision. Which group element should leadership codify and socialize to achieve this?
Belonging and identity rituals
Security and safety provisions
Shared goals and quarterly targets
Norms and roles clarifying expectations
A temporary cross-functional task force forms to launch a product within three months. Which label and rationale are most accurate?
Secondary group due to larger, goal-oriented, temporary focus
Formal group due to friendship-based membership
Primary group due to small, close-knit, long-term bonds
Informal group due to spontaneous social interaction
A new hire seeks faster skill growth and chooses a mentoring circle instead of self-study. Which joining motive is primarily at play, and how does it support development?
Security; reduces risk of project failure
Power; aggregates authority over decisions
Status; increases public recognition quickly
Learning; enables exchange of knowledge and skills
A manager notices low participation in meetings despite clear objectives. Which intervention best targets the underlying group dynamic to raise engagement?
Increase interaction channels and peer dialogue
Shorten meetings to reduce time pressure
Replace members to change the group category
Issue stricter performance metrics and penalties
A community volunteer network wants members to feel identified with the cause and stay committed. Which combination would most likely build that identity?
Interdependence and individual competition
Shared goals and visible belonging cues
Security provisions and private insurance
Informal chats and unstructured agendas
A newly formed cross-functional team is polite but unsure about roles. As leader, which action best accelerates progress to the next stage of development?
Define clear goals and clarify responsibilities
Reduce meetings to avoid early conflicts
Increase supervision and control of tasks
Encourage competition to reveal strong leaders
Two months in, your team debates ownership of tasks and shows emotional reactions. Which leadership response most effectively reduces dysfunction while maintaining momentum?
Split the team into smaller isolated groups
Facilitate structured conflict resolution sessions
Delay decisions until emotions subside naturally
Rotate leaders weekly to diffuse tensions
A project has stabilized with shared norms and rising trust. Which metric best validates that the team is moving into the norming stage rather than performing?
Quantified gains in unit cost efficiency
Minimal need for managerial intervention
Consistent delivery ahead of schedule
Increased peer feedback and aligned workflows
You inherit a high-output team that hits targets with little oversight. A new complex task is added. What intervention best sustains the performing stage?
Add detailed daily checklists for control
Protect autonomy while aligning on outcomes
Reassign roles to refresh team dynamics
Introduce frequent top-down status reviews
At project close, a manager plans a retrospective with recognition moments and lessons learned. Which primary stage objective does this support?
Reestablishing initial team expectations
Escalating unresolved conflicts to leaders
Rapid reallocation of unused resources
Reflection and evaluation before dissolution
Which scenario most clearly risks regression from norming back to storming?
Transparent decision rules reduce uncertainty
Increased trust enables peer coaching
Stable processes deepen shared practices
Ambiguous new priorities disrupt role clarity
A startup forms a product squad with heavy dependence on the founder. What is the most strategic action to intentionally reduce that dependence?
Codify roles and empower peer decision rights
Centralize approvals through the founder only
Delay role decisions until product-market fit
Limit cross-functional collaboration initially
During storming, power struggles are common. Which facilitation technique best channels disagreement into productive norms?
Assign a single arbiter to decide all disputes
Silence dissent to maintain short-term peace
Allow unmoderated debates until fatigue ends
Create a working agreement using consensus
A team shows high productivity and collaboration, but a key member resigns. Which plan best preserves performing-level outcomes?
Redistribute tasks randomly to everyone
Cancel retrospectives to save project time
Pause work until a full replacement is hired
Implement knowledge handover and role backfills
Which practice best increases group cohesiveness without creating groupthink risks?
Limit information sharing across functions
Foster trust while inviting dissenting views
Enforce unanimity on all major decisions
Reward conformity over constructive critique
A project team wants to improve group cohesiveness without inflating costs. Which action most directly targets a listed driver of cohesiveness?
Recruit diverse specialists across departments
Reduce team size to a smaller core unit
Rotate members frequently between projects
Set individual bonuses unrelated to team goals
A leadership workshop claims that fostering similarity among members always improves performance. Using the concept of cohesiveness, which critique is most defensible?
Similarity eliminates external threats to project success
Similarity mostly reduces coordination and motivation
Similarity can raise satisfaction yet entrench groupthink risks
Similarity ensures innovation by broadening perspectives
Two sales teams face a new competitor. Team A becomes tightly knit and adapts quickly; Team B becomes cohesive but resists change. Which explanation best reconciles these outcomes?
External threats can boost cohesion while risking rigidity
Leadership quality is irrelevant when threats are present
External threats always decrease cohesiveness and agility
Cohesiveness has only positive effects on performance
A manager must balance positive and negative effects of cohesiveness. Which policy best preserves benefits while mitigating downsides?
Reward unanimous decisions without justification
Schedule premortems and invite devil’s advocacy
Discourage dissent to maintain coordination
Increase group size to reduce satisfaction
Which scenario most clearly signals the symptom ‘illusion of invulnerability’ in groupthink?
Leaders require risk logs for critical launches
The team delays approval pending external review
Members dismiss warnings because past launches succeeded
Analysts prepare alternative forecasts for scenarios
A product council unanimously approves a plan after a brief meeting. Later, you learn dissenters stayed silent to avoid conflict. Which groupthink symptom was most directly involved?
Pressure on dissenters post-decision
Collective rationalization of evidence
Illusion of invulnerability bias
Self-censorship during deliberations
Which practice most effectively reduces ‘pressure on dissenters’ without destroying cohesion?
Tying pay to unanimous consensus rates
Publicly ranking peers by team loyalty
Anonymous voting before open discussion
Banning disagreement during meetings
A startup touts rapid decisions by a small, tight team. Investors worry about overlooked alternatives. Which mitigation preserves speed yet challenges consensus?
Ignore external competition signals
Adopt consensus as the only approval rule
Expand the team with random hires
Rotate a red team to critique proposals
Which combination best matches factors that increase cohesiveness listed in the material?
Small size, shared success, effective leadership
Frequent turnover, internal rivalries, autonomy
Individual incentives, loose goals, remote members
Large size, diverse values, weak leadership
A division shows high satisfaction, better coordination, and low absenteeism—but also conformity pressure. Which diagnosis best explains this pattern?
Moderate cohesiveness with no clear effects
High cohesiveness with emergent groupthink risks
Weak leadership with unrelated team dynamics
Low cohesiveness with independent work norms
A product team shows illusion of unanimity, few members dominate, and options are not critically evaluated. Which immediate step would most directly counter these patterns and improve decision quality?
Rotate a devil’s advocate role each meeting
Shorten meetings to speed decisions
Increase team size by three members
Adopt majority voting without debate
A manager fears lack of creativity and ignored alternatives in a merger plan. Which combined actions best reduce groupthink while preserving efficiency?
Invite external opinions and set a critique segment
Use anonymous voting without prior discussion
Defer all decisions to the most senior member
Ban disagreements and enforce strict consensus
An executive team wants higher quality decisions with broad acceptance but worries about time cost. Which approach balances the advantages of group decision making with its main disadvantage?
Skip evaluation to meet deadlines
Time-box discussions with structured evaluation
Allow free discussion without time limits
Let two members decide for the group
During a safety review, the leader notices silence interpreted as agreement. What practice should be instituted to surface hidden dissent and avoid illusion of unanimity?
Close discussion once first solution appears
Explicitly request counterarguments from each member
Record silence as a vote in favor
Restrict comments to subject-matter experts
A startup board fears dominance by a few members. Which facilitation plan most directly addresses this risk while leveraging diverse viewpoints?
Pre-assign decisions to founding members
Round-robin speaking and rotating facilitation
Require unanimous agreement before speaking
Prioritize speakers by seniority and tenure
When should a devil’s advocate be appointed versus seeking external opinions during strategic planning?
Use devil’s advocate randomly; external opinions are generally unnecessary
Use devil’s advocate after final vote; invite outsiders only for publicity
Use devil’s advocate to enforce consensus; avoid outsiders to prevent bias
Use devil’s advocate for internal critique; invite outsiders for fresh perspectives
A committee is rushing to meet a deadline and ignores alternatives. Which structured step most effectively reintroduces critical evaluation without derailing progress?
Allocate a fixed segment to explore risks and options
Delay work until more members are hired
Adopt first idea that seems workable
Remove time limits and continue debating
Which scenario best illustrates the risk–benefit tradeoff of group decision making?
Improved speed but fewer perspectives considered
Broader acceptance but slower due to coordination
Faster decisions with reduced employee input
Lower time cost and minimal need for evaluation
To reduce the risk of groupthink during product brainstorming, which ground rule best preserves the free flow of ideas while ensuring later rigor?
Separate idea generation from later critical review
End the session once consensus emerges
Critique ideas immediately during listing phase
Limit contributions to two ideas per person
A cross-functional team wants diverse viewpoints without sacrificing decision acceptance. Which meeting design supports both goals?
Skip voting and let the chair decide
Restrict participants to the core technical group
Allow open talk with no final convergence
Invite varied roles and plan a synthesis vote
A cross-functional team must choose a method to generate many ideas quickly while postponing evaluation. Which technique best fits this need?
Majority voting using simple majority rule
Nominal Group Technique with structured ranking
Consensus decision making focusing on collaboration
Brainstorming with no criticism during idea generation
A manager wants equal participation, first collecting ideas individually, then discussing as a group before prioritizing. Which approach aligns with this plan?
Majority voting emphasizing speed over depth
Consensus decision making acceptable to all
Delphi Technique with anonymous expert rounds
Nominal Group Technique with individual idea generation
You must gather expert judgments on market entry anonymously across several rounds to move toward agreement. Which method is most appropriate?
Delphi Technique using multiple anonymous rounds
Brainstorming enforcing no criticism rule
Consensus decision making stressing collaboration
Majority voting resolving by majority rule
A leadership retreat wants a decision that everyone can support, even if not everyone’s first choice. Which decision rule should they adopt?
Consensus decision making acceptable to all members
Nominal Group Technique with silent ideation
Majority voting that may ignore minority views
Delphi Technique relying on anonymous experts
A product council needs a quick choice among three features but worries minority perspectives might be overlooked. Which method fits their speed goal yet has the cited risk?
Delphi rounds cultivate anonymous expert input
Brainstorming focuses solely on idea fluency
Consensus process ensures buy-in and inclusivity
Majority voting is fast but may ignore minority views
Lewin framed behavior B as a function of person P and environment E. Which application best demonstrates using this formula in managing teams?
Assigning anonymous surveys to experts
Redesigning workspace norms to shift team behavior
Counting votes to accelerate decisions
Screening only for high individual motivation
A new hire shows bias favoring her department and stereotyping another unit after a merger. Which theory most directly explains this pattern?
Social Identity Theory about in-groups and out-groups
Delphi Technique about anonymous expert views
Field Theory emphasizing forces in group fields
Realistic Conflict Theory about scarce resources
Two divisions compete over limited R&D funds, escalating hostility. Leaders set a shared innovation goal requiring pooled resources, which reduces tension. Which theory predicts this?
Realistic Conflict Theory using superordinate goals
Consensus Decision Making requiring full agreement
Field Theory centering perception and motivation
Nominal Group Technique structuring discussions
You are advising a project team on sequencing methods: first, generate many options without evaluation; next, narrow choices through structured ranking and discussion; finally, adopt a broadly supported solution. Which ordered combination is most coherent?
Brainstorming, Nominal Group Technique, Consensus
Delphi Technique, Majority Voting, Brainstorming
Consensus, Realistic Conflict Theory, Majority
Majority Voting, Brainstorming, Social Identity
A CEO wants to minimize prejudice between two departments after a contentious reorganization. Choose the most evidence-based first step drawing from the listed theories.
Create superordinate goals requiring interdepartmental cooperation
Hold faster majority votes to decide resource allocations
Ban criticism during idea generation sessions
Rely on anonymous expert panels distanced from staff
A project team shows strong emotional bonds but tolerates shortcuts that violate safety protocols. Using the dimensions of cohesion, which diagnosis best guides an intervention plan?
Strengthen task cohesion by realigning goal commitments
Reduce overall cohesion by rotating all members frequently
Increase emotional cohesion through team-building retreats
Enhance normative cohesion with stricter dress code rules
A manager wants higher performance by boosting cohesion. What condition must be ensured to avoid a performance decline?
Leaders exercise unquestioned authority over choices
Members suppress individuality to reduce conflict
Group norms explicitly support productivity outcomes
Cohesion remains purely emotional without norms
Two sales teams are equally cohesive. Team A upholds rigorous client-ethics norms; Team B normalizes aggressive misrepresentation. Predict performance and satisfaction patterns.
Both teams similar performance but lower satisfaction
Team A higher performance; Team B high satisfaction but reduced performance
Both teams higher performance due to cohesion effects
Team A lower satisfaction; Team B higher performance
Design a policy to limit groupthink without destroying cohesion. Which combined approach is most defensible?
Centralize authority to accelerate unanimous decisions
Amplify loyalty pledges and punish public disagreement
Establish dissent norms and rotate devil’s advocate roles
Require emotional bonding events every decision cycle
A product committee rapidly reaches consensus after a senior executive signals a preferred option. Which psychological mechanism most likely drove the decision?
Obedience to authority in hierarchical contexts
Cognitive dissonance after pilot test failures
Emotional cohesion developed during offsites
Normative cohesion through shared jargon
Members privately doubt a merger but publicly endorse it to avoid social costs. Which mechanism best explains their public support?
Task cohesion strengthening merger goal commitment
Motivated reasoning driven by bonus incentives
Normative cohesion enforcing procedural compliance
Conformity pressure creating alignment with peers
After choosing a risky strategy, a team selectively interprets data to defend it. Which mechanism maintains the decision?
Motivated reasoning sustaining prior commitments
Normative cohesion punishing late submissions
Emotional cohesion increasing social attraction
Task cohesion reallocating resources efficiently
An analyst is asked to measure groupthink across departments. Which challenge should the analyst anticipate when designing metrics?
Collecting performance data is prohibited legally
Operationalizing groupthink reliably is difficult
Norms cannot be observed in organizational settings
Measuring cohesion requires impossible experiments
A startup worries that tight-knit culture could harm innovation. Which risk most directly connects cohesion to reduced creativity?
Task cohesion diverts attention from market research
Normative cohesion eliminates all informal networks
Excessive cohesion suppresses individuality and dissent
Emotional cohesion lowers commitment to deadlines
Two divisions compete intensely. Leadership invests in internal bonding rituals that heighten in-group loyalty. What unintended outcome may escalate between divisions?
Authority effects will neutralize peer conformity
Groupthink will immediately disappear organization-wide
Cross-divisional collaboration will naturally increase
Intergroup hostility may intensify under high cohesion
A leadership team faces a tight deadline and must choose between speed and thorough analysis. Which dual-process approach best balances accuracy with time constraints?
Begin with System 1, then validate using System 2
Rely solely on System 1 to maintain momentum
Freeze decisions until full consensus naturally emerges
Outsource to external analysts to avoid bias entirely
A startup board is drifting toward extreme options after an energizing pitch. Which psychological variable is most likely at play, and what intervention fits best?
Group polarization; introduce dialectical inquiry
Social facilitation; assign more observers
Minority influence; increase anonymous voting
Risky shift; reward faster decisions
Under what condition is System 1 most likely to dominate group decision behavior, and what is a prudent managerial response?
Ambiguous data; prohibit intuitive judgments
High time pressure; add a rapid devil’s advocate pass
Low stakes; require exhaustive external audits
Stable environment; eliminate timeboxing entirely
A team lead wants to reduce conformity bias without slowing the meeting excessively. Which technique aligns with that goal?
Open brainstorming without constraints
Devil’s advocacy with structured dissent
Dialectical inquiry across all units
Stepladder with full team inclusion
A product council fears dominant voices are silencing others. Which method strategically counters dominance while preserving decision quality?
Anonymous surveys after final decision
Time-limited pitches without Q&A
Unmoderated debate with open-floor rules
Stepladder technique with sequential inclusion
An R&D group wants to surface competing solutions rigorously before committing resources. Which approach provides the strongest structured comparison?
Dialectical inquiry with opposing analyses
Devil’s advocate with brief critique
Risky shift to accelerate consensus
Social facilitation through larger audience
Which pairing correctly matches variable and expected effect on group performance?
Minority influence; elimination of all conflict
Social facilitation; improved simple task performance
Risky shift; movement toward safer choices
Group polarization; reduced extremity of views
A manager wants to reduce social pressure and evaluation apprehension in idea generation. Which implementation fits best?
Adopt open voting with public tallies
Use computer-mediated decision processes
Expand in-person debate audience size
Mandate video-on for all participants
In which practice area would structured group decision tools most directly support leadership assessment and team dynamics work?
Educational psychology for solitary study
Organizational psychology in workplace settings
Social psychology for laboratory only
Clinical psychology in individual therapy
A minority subgroup consistently presents evidence challenging the majority’s plan. What outcome should a skilled facilitator anticipate if the process is well-managed?
Total elimination of dissenting viewpoints
Minority influence leading to refined decisions
Complete reversal to extreme positions
Inevitable escalation to groupthink patterns
A manager wants a team that can solve novel problems quickly. Which psychological feature should she prioritize when composing the team?
Hierarchical control with strict supervision
Goal interdependence across complementary roles
Task interdependence with redundant skills
Isolated specialists with narrow mandates
Individual autonomy with minimal overlap
Two departments merge. To reduce conflict and increase coordination, which design best reflects a team as a social system?
Anonymous feedback with zero interdependence
Shared mental models with mutual accountability
Independent KPIs with personal incentives
Solo targets with private information
Rotating leaders with no shared norms
A startup’s product squad shares outcomes but not tasks. Bugs persist due to handoffs. What change best improves performance?
Decrease goal interdependence by splitting objectives
Increase task interdependence via cross-functional pairing
Eliminate shared norms to boost creativity
Replace mutual accountability with individual scoring
Add more specialists with narrower responsibilities
A new team suffers from social loafing. Which practice most directly counters it while fitting team principles?
Reduce interaction to minimize coordination
Assign hidden tasks to surprise members
Establish mutual accountability with clear peer review
Outsource quality checks to external auditors
Increase individual bonuses with private rankings
Which scenario best demonstrates collective efficacy in action?
Leader alone is confident about project delivery
Stakeholders are optimistic without team buy-in
Members believe together they can hit the sprint goal
Each member thinks only their task will succeed
Team doubts capacity but hopes to be lucky
A leader wants to enhance members’ identity with the team. Which intervention aligns with the theory mentioned?
Reward only individual output to drive competition
Build a strong team identity per Social Identity Theory
Isolate workstations to avoid affiliation
Prohibit symbols or narratives about the team
Rotate membership weekly to prevent cliques
Under deadline pressure, which practice most plausibly raises effort through social facilitation?
Randomized task assignment without goals
Visible progress boards and joint goal rituals
Silent mode work with no interactions
Private reports sent only to the CEO
Hidden work streams with secret metrics
A firm wants better decisions from its cross-functional group. Which mechanism provides the stated organizational benefit?
Limit data sources to internal dashboards
Leverage cognitive diversity during deliberation
Centralize choices to a single expert
Shorten meetings by preapproved templates
Ignore dissent to reach speedier consensus
New members feel unsafe raising risks. Which action most directly increases psychological safety and stress buffering?
Mandated overtime to meet milestones
Anonymous surveys without follow-up
Strict penalties for missed predictions
Solo postmortems without discussion
Peer support norms and structured debriefs
To build capability fast, which approach best uses learning and feedback mechanisms noted?
Individual study without shared sessions
Observational learning with timely feedback loops
Random trials without reflection cycles
One-time lectures with no practice tasks
Annual reviews with delayed comments
A manager wants outcomes that exceed the sum of individual contributions. Which structure best fits this requirement?
Work groups with neutral synergy
Work teams with positive synergy
Work groups with negative synergy
Informal groups with loose synergy
A unit emphasizes individual goals and limited interaction. What performance pattern should the manager reasonably expect?
More than sum of individual efforts
Exactly the sum of individual efforts
Less than the sum due to overload
Unpredictable beyond normal variance
Two divisions must jointly deliver an innovative product under one shared goal and mutual accountability. Which arrangement is most suitable?
Work team with shared team goals
Work group with individual goals
Loose coalition of contractors
Committee with advisory goals
A director needs constant member interaction to solve interdependent tasks. Which choice aligns with that need?
Work team with high continuous interaction
Work group with limited interaction
Virtual community with sporadic contact
Task force with annual check-ins
Which example best illustrates the psychological distinction between a team and a group?
Team sharing collective identity
Group sharing cafeteria space
Team sharing hardware resources
Group sharing a budget ledger
A plant forms a temporary unit to analyze a bottleneck and improve a workflow, disbanding after fixes. What type is this?
Problem-solving team
Self-managed team
Project team
Virtual team
An organization wants a unit that plans, organizes, and controls its own work without direct supervision. What should it establish?
Self-managed team
Project team
Work group
Cross-functional team
A challenge arises when team members collaborate entirely online. Which issue requires deliberate strategies to address?
Trust and cohesion
Budget approvals
Office space allocation
Compliance audits
A company combines marketing, engineering, and finance members to address a complex launch. What team design is this?
Cross-functional team
Problem-solving team
Virtual team
Self-managed team
Leadership needs a unit formed for a specific task with a defined timeline. Which option best matches?
Standing committee
Work group
Virtual community
Project team
A manager wants to boost team effectiveness for a complex project with tight deadlines. Which intervention best aligns with Hackman’s model to provide direction without micromanaging?
Announce a compelling direction with clear priorities
Set only high-level vision and remove all milestones
Increase daily oversight with task-level instructions
Rotate leaders weekly to avoid decision bottlenecks
A startup is experiencing miscommunication between engineering and marketing, causing delays. Using the IPO model, which action targets the Processes component most directly?
Hire members with stronger technical skills profiles
Redefine team mission to a broader market scope
Provide larger performance-based cash incentives
Establish structured cross-functional communication rituals
A newly formed team lacks trust and coordination. Which bundle of Inputs would most likely improve later Outputs in the IPO model?
Detailed KPIs and expanded market segmentation
Sales targets and quarterly bonus multipliers
Aggressive timelines and stricter budget controls
Personality diversity and shared leadership capability
A team struggles with unclear roles and redundant work. Which Hackman requirement addresses this root cause most directly?
Enabling structure with well-defined role design
Supportive context with richer reward systems
Compelling direction with inspiring slogans
Expert coaching with periodic motivational talks
A department wants to sustain high performance over time while avoiding burnout. Which Output reflects success in the IPO model beyond task completion?
Satisfaction and member well-being metrics
More frequent product release cadence
Higher volume of tasks processed
Lower unit cost per deliverable
Two teams have similar skills, but one consistently adapts to change and shares feedback effectively. Which quality most plausibly explains the performance gap?
Strict adherence to original plans
Individual recognition over shared credit
Cooperation combined with adaptability
Task specialization without cross-training
During a conflict over resource allocation, which behavior best reflects a good team player while protecting team relationships?
Avoid discussion to preserve short-term harmony
Use conflict management skills to reach integrative solutions
Assert positional power to secure needed assets
Escalate immediately to executive arbitration
A project lead wants to develop a psychologically safe environment. Which action is most consistent with expert coaching in Hackman’s model?
Reduce meeting frequency to increase task time
Provide timely developmental feedback on team processes
Authorize overtime to accelerate near-term delivery
Assign stretch goals without additional support
A team meets deadlines but members feel undervalued. Which single behavior would most directly improve collective motivation and cohesion?
Focusing recognition on top individual performers
Shifting performance reviews to stack ranking
Willingness to share credit and responsibility
Setting more ambitious quarterly OKRs
Which change would best align the organization with a supportive context in Hackman’s model for a data analytics team?
Reduce the number of team members by two
Eliminate peer feedback to limit conflict
Provide tools, information access, and recognition systems
Set ambiguous objectives to spur creativity
