Search Header Logo

Native Title Australia

Authored by j ven

History

7th - 12th Grade

Used 14+ times

Native Title Australia
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

11 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

10 sec • 1 pt

The doctrine of terra nullius means

Ground with nothing on it

The land was owned by the colonists

Land that is legally deemed to be unoccupied or uninhabited

Land that can be bought and sold

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

20 sec • 1 pt

The doctrine of reception means

The separation of powers means the parliament can make the laws

The division of powers means the government can make the laws

English law dominates when Britain colonised uninhabited land

The land had no legal system

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

10 sec • 1 pt

Aboriginal people were not seen to own the land because

They did not want to own the land

They had a nomadic lifestyle

Their customs and traditions forbid them from owning the land

They had sophisticated land title systems

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

10 sec • 1 pt

The first legislation which acknowledged traditional owners of the land is known as the

Aboriginal Land Act 1945

Native Australian Title Act 1990

Mabo Land Act 1994

Native Title Act 1993

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

10 sec • 1 pt

To make a successful native title claim, indigenous Australians need to

Prove that they own the land

Prove that they have enough money to buy the land

Prove that they have a relative who lives on the land

Prove that they have an ongoing connection to the land

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

20 sec • 1 pt

Media Image

The Wik High Court Decision

Stated that pastoral rights took higher priority than native title rights

Stated that native title rights took higher priority than pastoral rights

Acknowledged that Native Title could coexist with pastoral rights

Lead to the passing of the Native Title Act 1993

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

20 sec • 1 pt

Mabo v. Queensland 1992 High Court of Australia (HCA)

Was based on discrimination on the grounds of race, under international law

Was based on the changes to the referendum

Was based on the changes to the Native Title Act

Was based on customary law

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?