Twelve Angry Men Review

Twelve Angry Men Review

9th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

22S - Dispute Resolution

22S - Dispute Resolution

11th Grade

16 Qs

Twelve Angry Men Review

Twelve Angry Men Review

9th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

The Court System

The Court System

10th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

Criminal Justice Ch 3

Criminal Justice Ch 3

9th - 12th Grade

17 Qs

P2 Crim v Civ

P2 Crim v Civ

10th - 12th Grade

16 Qs

Juvenile Court

Juvenile Court

5th - 12th Grade

17 Qs

CJE Common Assessment #2

CJE Common Assessment #2

9th - 12th Grade

20 Qs

Ch.10 Test Review

Ch.10 Test Review

9th - 11th Grade

22 Qs

Twelve Angry Men Review

Twelve Angry Men Review

Assessment

Quiz

Other

9th - 12th Grade

Easy

Created by

Maggie Weimer

Used 2+ times

FREE Resource

20 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

The judge tells the twelve members of the jury that their verdict must be unanimous. That is,

They

must base their verdict on reason, not emotion

They have only twelve hours in which to decide the case

Their verdict must be in agreement with the laws of the state.

Their verdict must be one that all twelve of them agree to.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

In the beginning, Juror Eight says that he

is convinced that the boy is innocent

has not made up his mind yet

wants to finish jury duty quickly

believes that the boy is guilty

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

During the trial, which of the following was NOT cited as evidence pointing to they boy's guilt?

Buying a knife

A quarrel between father and son

Cash found in the boy's possession

An eyewitness report

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

At the start of Act II

Juror eight has persuaded a second juror to vote "Not Guilty"

Jurors seven and ten are reconsidering their votes

The foreman senses that the jury members are all hopelessly deadlocked

All but one of the jurors believe the defendant to be guilty.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

Juror Eight demonstrates that the old man (who testified against the defendant) could not have heard the boy yell at his father because the

man is actually hard of hearing

boy had already left home

elevated train made too much noise

other neighbors did not hear it

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

According to Juror Nine, the old man testified as he did probably because he

wanted to feel important at least once in his life

wanted to get even with the boy, who had once mistreated him

was paid to accuse the boy of murder

wanted to see justice done

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

1 min • 1 pt

The old man testified that he had run and opened his door within a period of 15 seconds

and juror three proves that the old man's timing is accurate

and all of the jurors questioned his testimony

but juror eight proves that the old man could not have done so

and he showed in the courtroom how he did so

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?