Federalists VS> Anti-Federalists

The word ratify means:

• To disagree

• To vote

• To approve

• To complete

Answer explanation

The question asks for the meaning of the word 'ratify.' Among the given options, 'To approve' is the correct choice, as ratifying something means giving formal consent or approval to a contract, agreement, or treaty, making it officially valid.

The first ten amendments, or additions to the Constitution, which give people important rights such as freedom of speech are called:

• Articles of Confederation

• Checks and Balances

• Bill of Rights

• Magna Carta

Answer explanation

The correct answer is the Bill of Rights. The first ten amendments to the United States Constitution are collectively known as the Bill of Rights. These amendments were added to protect individual liberties and rights, such as freedom of speech, religion, and the right to bear arms. The other options, Articles of Confederation, Checks and Balances, and Magna Carta, are not related to the first ten amendments.

People who opposed the Constitution because they felt it created a national government that was too strong were called:

• Federalists

• Anti-Federalists

• Radicals

• Activists

Answer explanation

Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution because they believed it created a national government that was too powerful. They feared that the central government would overpower the states and infringe on individual liberties. In contrast, Federalists supported the Constitution and a strong central government. The Anti-Federalist position highlights the correct choice.

Federalists believed:

• That there are safeguards in the constitution that will never allow the government to be tyrannical like Britain.

• That they would not ratify the constitution without a bill of rights.

• That the Constitution gives the government too much power and the power should remain in the states.

• All of the above

Answer explanation

Federalists believed in the effectiveness of the Constitution's safeguards against tyranny. They argued that the checks and balances, separation of powers, and other provisions would prevent the government from becoming oppressive like Britain. This belief is reflected in the correct option, which states that there are safeguards in the Constitution to prevent tyranny.

Which group believed that the Constitution gave the national (central) government too much power and states too little power?

• Radicals

• Advocates

• Anti-Federalists

• Federalists

Answer explanation

The Anti-Federalists were a group of individuals who opposed the creation of a stronger U.S. federal government and which later opposed the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. They believed that the Constitution gave the national government too much power and states too little power, hence they are the correct answer to the question.

Which group fears the Constitution gave too much power to the executive branch of government--The president could end up like a king.

• Radicals

• Advocates

• Anti-Federalists

• Federalists

Answer explanation

The Anti-Federalists were a group that opposed the ratification of the U.S. Constitution because they feared it gave too much power to the executive branch of government. They were concerned that the president could end up wielding power similar to a king, which was against their belief in a decentralized government.

Which group would agree with this quote," ...after so recent a triumph [win] over the British king, after blood has been spent, it is truly astonishing [surprising] that a set of men among our Americans would champion [support] a government that would destroy our liberties."

• Federalist

• Anti-Federalist

Answer explanation

The quote criticizes those who support a government that would undermine liberties, after a recent victory over the British king. This sentiment aligns with the Anti-Federalist perspective, who were wary of a strong central government and prioritized individual and state rights. Therefore, the Anti-Federalists would agree with this quote.

Anti-Federalists...

• Would not ratify the Constitution without a Bill or Rights or a list of rights of all citizens.

• Represented farmers led by Jefferson, Henry, and Adams.

• Were not in support of a strong national government.

• All of the Above

Answer explanation

The answer is 'All of the Above' because each statement is true about the Anti-Federalists. They wouldn't ratify the Constitution without a Bill of Rights, represented farmers led by Jefferson, Henry, and Adams, and were not in support of a strong national government.

The Constitution gives the federal government enough power to overpower the states

• Federalist

• Anti-Federalist

Answer explanation

The Anti-Federalist perspective argues that the Constitution gives the federal government too much power, potentially overpowering the states. They were concerned about the centralization of authority and the potential for tyranny. In contrast, Federalists supported a strong central government and believed that the Constitution provided an appropriate balance of power between the federal and state governments.

It will not be possible for the federal government to overpower the states because the states are a necessary part of the federal government.

• Federalist

• Anti-Federalist

Answer explanation

The statement reflects a Federalist perspective, as it emphasizes the interdependence between the federal government and the states. Federalists believed in a strong central government, but they also recognized the importance of states in the federal system. This view suggests that the federal government cannot overpower the states because they are essential components of the overall structure.