ITLR

A rebuttable presumption is where...

• The court keeps an open mind

• The court begins with a point of view which cannot be changed

• The court can refuse permission to appeal

• The court begins with a point of view which can be changed

The presumption in social and domestic agreements was rebutted in Parker v Clarke because...

• One party had given up their security

• Money had changed hands

• The couple were separated

• There was a formal letter about child maintenance

The presumption in social and domestic agreements is that...

• There is always intention to create legal relations

• There is no intention to create legal relations

• There might be intention to create legal relations

• Intention to create legal relations is not required for a valid agreement

Which case ruled that a letter of comfort does not signal intention to create legal relations?

• Sadler v Reynolds

• Jones v Vernon's Pools

• Kleinwort Benson v Malaysian Mining

• Edwards v Skyways

In which case was a competition held to signal the presence of ITLR as it was for promotional purposes?

• Esso v Commissioners of Customs & Excise

• McGowan v Radio Buxton

• Wilson v Burnett

• Sadler v Reynolds

The principle in Sadler v Reynolds is that...

• Business agreements are presumed to have ITLR

• Social and domestic agreements are presumed not to have ITLR

• In 'mixed' agreements the burden is on the party claiming ITLR to disprove it

• In 'mixed' agreements the burden is on the party claiming ITLR to prove it

Which case was distinguished from Balfour v Balfour on the facts?

• Merritt v Merritt

• Darke v Strout

• Parker v Clarke

• Blue v Ashley

In which case was D promised a Renault Clio but ended up with a toy car instead?

• Kleinwort Benson v Malaysian Mining

• Esso v Commissioners of Customs & Excise

• McGowan v Radio Buxton

• Wilson v Burnett

An agreement that is 'binding in honour only' is known as...

• An honourable pledge clause

• A letter of comfort

• A rebuttable presumption

• A promotional agreement

The principle in Kleinwort Benson v Malaysian Mining is that...

• A guarantee is not legally binding

• Competitions are legally binding if for promotional purposes

• A letter of comfort is not legally binding

• An honourable pledge clause can rebut the presumption in business cases