12 Angry Men--Act 3

What is wrong with the way the father is stabbed?

• He couldn't have been stabbed that way with the height difference.

• The wound was too deep for a young boy to make.

• The wound was too high.

• The wound was too low.

What was the problem with the woman's testimony?

• She was probably lying to get attention.

• She was probably too tired to see what actually happened.

• She likely wouldn't have had her glasses on to see the crime.

• She didn't have good hearing.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.6

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.SL.8.3

CCSS.W.8.1B

Who was the last juror to vote 'not guilty'?

• 10

• 3

• 4

• 12

Tags

CCSS.RL.8.1

What was the second vote in act 3 trying to decide?

• To see if they could go home and finish the deliberation in the morning.

• To see if there is reasonable doubt.

• To see if the boy is innocent.

• If they should tell the judge they are a hung jury.

What was the final verdict?

• not guilty

• guilty

• hung jury

• they are still deciding

What doubt did juror 8 create when talking about how the crime was committed?

• That the boy probably really loved his father and regrets his actions.

• That the boy was probably really at the movies.

• That the boy would have had to be smart then dumb then smart again.

• That they couldn't make a decision without more information.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.6

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.8.3

What was the problem with the story about the old man seeing the boy run past his door?

• He never would have made it to the door to see who it was.

• He would have been too tired to recognize the boy.

• He would have needed his glasses to see and probably wasn't wearing them.

• It would have been too dark to see who it was.

Acting out how the crime happened...

• Helped the jurors understand the crime.

• Was a waste of time.

• Was a lot of fun for the jurors to do.

• Was a requirement from the judge.

In the end, the boy was...

• Convicted

• Acquitted

• Sentenced

Did you enjoy reading this play?

• yes

• no